Jacob Heinel Jensen

Jacob Heinel Jensen is a Danish journalist and the U.S. correspondent for Berlingske, based in Washington, D.C. His reporting includes American elections and U.S. relations with Denmark and Greenland.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Jacob Heinel Jensen, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Next steps for the Greenland deal Trump called 'permanent control'

Get an email if Denmark's and Greenland's parliaments act on the agreement, or if officials dispute or repeat Trump's 'permanent control' description.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Jacob Heinel Jensen

Jacob Heinel Jensen

Role at the time: U.S. correspondent (USA-korrespondent) at Berlingske, in a signed analysis ('Analyse') on berlingske.dk

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

In a signed analysis published by Berlingske at 7:39 PM EDT on the day of the announcement, U.S. correspondent Jacob Heinel Jensen wrote that the wildest part is not the agreement itself but that ministers, diplomats and officials managed to sell it to Trump as a big personal success. The article's headline says Trump should not be told it is the Kingdom of Denmark that has prevailed. The quotation is a translation from Danish; only the article's opening paragraphs were readable without a subscription.

“The wildest part is not the agreement itself, which the U.S. is entering into with Greenland and Denmark. The wildest part is that ministers, diplomats and officials have managed to sell it to Trump as a big personal success for the president.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Schhh. Nævn ikke for Trump at det er Kongeriget Danmark, der har sejret · BerlingskeArticle labelled 'Analyse'; quoted text is paragraphs 1 and 2 of the body, directly under the headline, standfirst and byline. Published 01.39 Copenhagen time on 19 Sept 2026 (2026-09-18T23:39:41Z, i.e. 7:39 PM EDT on 18 Sept).
Why we used this label

Heinel Jensen writes that officials succeeded in selling the agreement to Trump as a big personal success, and elsewhere in the analysis says the result is far from Trump's ambition to make Greenland American and that the Kingdom's sovereignty is apparently not violated, while reporting Trump's no-expiry and no-adversary-presence statements without evaluating them. The closest competing label is “Mixed or conditional”, because he also calls the outcome a success for the U.S., Greenland and Denmark. That loses because that welcome is of the outcome, is not made conditional on anything and does not endorse Trump's description, while what he says about the description itself is a dispute over what the agreement means and who prevailed.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage