Jacob Heinel Jensen writes that officials sold Trump the Greenland agreement as a personal success
U.S. correspondent (USA-korrespondent) at Berlingske, in a signed analysis ('Analyse') on berlingske.dk
“The wildest part is not the agreement itself, which the U.S. is entering into with Greenland and Denmark. The wildest part is that ministers, diplomats and officials have managed to sell it to Trump as a big personal success for the president.”
Source and context
Analysis
About this source
Berlingske is paywalled. The rendered page shows the headline, standfirst, byline and the first two paragraphs (the quoted passage) to a non-subscriber. Published and modified timestamps are identical (2026-09-18T23:39:41Z) and were unchanged on a second fetch at about 9:25 AM EDT on 2026-09-19. Original Danish of the quoted passage: 'Det vildeste er ikke selve aftalen, som USA indgår med Grønland og Danmark. Det vildeste er, at det er lykkedes for ministre, diplomater og embedsfolk at sælge den til Trump som en stor personlig succes for præsidenten.' The English in the record is DI's translation. Not archived.
Original text
About this source
Read in full on the trumpstruth.org archive mirror, which shows the full text, the original post date (Friday, September 18, 2026, 05:18 pm EDT), the Truth Social status ID and the original URL https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/117294126158197822; truthsocial.com itself is Cloudflare-blocked and was not opened. The post says the United States “has entered into an Agreement,” whereas the Danish and Greenlandic release describes an expected agreement still to be signed. The identical text was posted on Trump’s X account (separate source). This page was captured by the mirror on September 19, 2026 at 11:51 AM EDT; the mirror’s later Truth Social entries through 12:52 PM EDT that day, including the transcript of a 1:06 AM video, do not mention Greenland.
Official statement
About this source
Context only (supports contextBefore, not the quotation). Official English version of the release; it says the three governments are expected to sign at the UN General Assembly next week, subject to national parliamentary procedures, and that there are no further comments. The release is dated 9/18/2026 with no time shown; TV 2's live blog logged 'Statsministeriet bekræfter aftale' at 23.39 Copenhagen time.
Reporting
About this source
Context only (supports contextAfter, not the quotation). TV 2 news summary in the same live blog; its list of open questions says the agreement's exact content has not been published and that signing is expected next week in New York. Read on 2026-09-19 through the server-rendered no-JS page.
Before the quotation
President Trump announced the agreement on Truth Social at 5:18 PM EDT on 18 September, saying it gives the United States permanent control over security and all other needs in Greenland. The Danish Prime Minister's Office then issued a release saying the three governments were expected to sign an agreement the following week, and the analysis was published at 7:39 PM EDT that evening.
After the quotation
TV 2's live blog reported the next morning that the agreement's exact content had not been made public.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Trump’s “permanent control” description of the announced U.S.-Denmark-Greenland security agreement
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's 18 September 2026 Truth Social description of a not-yet-signed, unpublished U.S.-Denmark-Greenland agreement as giving the United States permanent control over security and all other needs in Greenland. Heinel Jensen writes that officials succeeded in selling the agreement to Trump as a big personal success, and elsewhere in the analysis says the result is far from Trump's ambition to make Greenland American and that the Kingdom's sovereignty is apparently not violated, while reporting Trump's no-expiry and no-adversary-presence statements without evaluating them. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because he also calls the outcome a success for the U.S., Greenland and Denmark. That loses because that welcome is of the outcome, is not made conditional on anything and does not endorse Trump's description, while what he says about the description itself is a dispute over what the agreement means and who prevailed.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Donald Trump
Trump’s “permanent control” description of the announced U.S.-Denmark-Greenland security agreement
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“I'm looking forward to the ink being dry on the new agreement with the USA. And to us being able to see the content. Until then, I'm skeptical. I don't have much confidence in Trump.”Read statement
“We will have to wait with that until the agreement is published next week. So I don't have many comments on that.”Read statement
“Next week could be a good week… For Greenland, Denmark and the USA alike. Where a long period of uncertainty is hopefully replaced by a binding agreement that strengthens security in the Arctic and the North Atlantic and thus also our shared security in NATO and Europe - with respect for the Kingdom's red lines.”Read statement