Geoffrey Hinton

Portrait of Geoffrey Hinton
Cmichel67 via Wikimedia Commons

British-Canadian computer scientist and cognitive psychologist, emeritus professor at the University of Toronto, widely described as a godfather of artificial intelligence for his foundational work on neural networks. He shared the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics and the 2018 Turing Award, and resigned from Google in 2023 to speak more freely about AI risk.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Geoffrey Hinton on Artificial Intelligence and U.S. Politics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Geoffrey Hinton

Portrait of Geoffrey Hinton

Geoffrey Hinton

Role at the time: Computer scientist, Nobel laureate and emeritus professor at the University of Toronto, quoted in an ABC News report on his warning to Congress

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Geoffrey Hinton, the Nobel laureate and Turing Award winner widely called a godfather of artificial intelligence, warned Congress it has roughly a year, and not much more, if members want to be able to control AI. He said the technology has reached the point where it is building itself, that it will get out of control unless something is done, and that development needs to slow down, comparing a recent incident to a small Chernobyl. ABC reported he puts the odds that AI eventually wipes out humanity at 10 to 20 per cent. The timeframe, the probability estimate and the Chernobyl comparison are his own assessments.

“Maybe a year, but not much more than a year. … It is going to get out of control unless we do something. We need to slow down. And we've seen recently, it's something like a little Chernobyl.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)ABC News: Geoffrey Hinton warns Congress it has about a year to control AI2:00 segment. 00:08–00:26: Hinton's warning, including the timeframe and the Chernobyl comparison. 00:26–00:34: his stated probability that AI eventually wipes out humanity. 00:50–01:15: Sen. John Kennedy's kill-switch bill. 01:15–01:25: Rand Paul blocking it. 01:25–01:35: the administration's position on existing liability. 01:35 onward: an unrelated item on Flock surveillance cameras.
Why we used this label

Hinton supports it in an urgent form, addressing Congress directly, setting a roughly one-year window for action and calling for development to slow. That places him with Sanders (562), Gordon-Levitt (937) and Cantwell (728) rather than with Huang (727) or Zuckerberg (939), who reject the proposition. The closest competing label is “Mixed or conditional”; it loses because he attaches no condition and concedes nothing to the competitiveness argument other speakers in this case raise.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.