The Dispute Index

Gabe Amo

Portrait of Gabe Amo
U.S. House of Representatives

United States Representative and Democratic candidate for U.S. House in Rhode Island's 1st district.

Democratic candidate for U.S. House in Rhode Island's 1st Congressional District
X (Twitter) (opens in a new tab)Facebook (opens in a new tab)Instagram (opens in a new tab)

What we have documented

We have documented 3 statements by Gabe Amo, in 2 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Gabe Amo

Portrait of Gabe Amo

Gabe Amo

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Rhode Island 1st district

Condemned

Statement summary

Gabe Amo voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of Gabe Amo

Gabe Amo

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Rhode Island at the statement date.

Condemned

Statement summary

Amo condemns the war as unnecessary and illegal and demands that it end immediately.

“Congress just dealt a blow to Donald Trump’s disastrous, unnecessary, and illegal war of choice in Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Gabe Amo on the Iran warComplete original release or interview report; date-only timestamp represented at noon UTC
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Amo condemns the war as unnecessary and illegal and demands that it end immediately.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of Gabe Amo

Gabe Amo

Role at the time: U.S. Representative from Rhode Island

Condemned

Statement summary

Amo said he stood against what he called Donald Trump's reckless action forcing union workers out of work and raising energy prices, and said he would not be silent about what he called the weaponization of the federal government to disrupt clean energy investment.

“I’m proud to link arms with leaders in our state to stand against Donald Trump’s reckless action that forces union workers out of work and hikes energy prices I will not be silent in the face of the weaponization of the federal government to disrupt clean energy investments that will lower costs for Rhode Islanders and advance solutions to the climate crisis”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Governor McKee, Congressional Delegation, Union Leaders Condemn Trump Administration’s Attempt to Derail Multibillion-Dollar Revolution Wind Project Nearing CompletionRhode Island Governor's Office press release dated August 25, 2025; remarks by Congressmen Seth Magaziner and Gabe Amo.
Why we used this label

The case asks whether the federal halts of Revolution Wind construction were justified. Amo says he stands against Donald Trump's reckless action that forces union workers out of work and hikes energy prices, and says he will not be silent about what he called the weaponization of the federal government to disrupt clean energy investments. The release presents his remarks as a response to the stop-work order, and they reject the halt itself, so we used the Condemned label.

Read statementFull case: Was the federal government justified in halting Revolution Wind construction?

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage