Denny Hoskins

Portrait of Denny Hoskins
Lindsey Megan Photography; courtesy Missouri State ArchivesSourcePublic domainOriginal image retained; resized only.

Republican politician and certified public accountant serving as Missouri Secretary of State. He previously served in the Missouri Senate.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Denny Hoskins, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Missouri's map fight after the Supreme Court order

We'll email you if anyone seeks further Supreme Court review, when Missouri voters decide Proposition A, or if state officials respond to the order.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Denny Hoskins

Portrait of Denny Hoskins

Denny Hoskins

Role at the time: Missouri Secretary of State, the state's chief election official and a defendant in the state and federal cases

Defended or excused

Statement summary

In a news release on the day of the Supreme Court of Missouri's rulings, Hoskins said no court has ever rejected a congressional map that had already been used in an election. He added, "We may have lost the battle today, but the war to preserve our constitutional republic is far from over."

“Today’s Missouri Supreme Court rulings ignite nothing short of a Constitutional crisis. No court has ever rejected a congressional map that had already been used in an election, as the Missouri First Map was in the August primary. We may have lost the battle today, but the war to preserve our constitutional republic is far from over.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Statement from Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, CPA (September 3, 2026) · Denny HoskinsMissouri Secretary of State news release, For Immediate Release: Sept. 3, 2026
Why we used this label

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. Hoskins treats the ruling that bars the map from the general election as a constitutional crisis and says the fight continues, which defends using the map. The closest competing label, “Challenged the characterization”, loses because his objection is to the map being barred, not to how it is described.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage