Charles Fain Lehman

Portrait of Charles Fain Lehman
Charles Fain Lehman (@CharlesFLehman on X)

Charles Fain Lehman is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, where he works on policing and public safety.

What we have documented

We have documented 2 statements by Charles Fain Lehman, in 2 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

What happens next with the judge's findings on Larry Krasner?

Get an email if Judge Diamond rules on the reconsideration or recusal motions, if federal prosecutors act on the referral, or if Krasner appeals.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Charles Fain Lehman

Portrait of Charles Fain Lehman

Charles Fain Lehman

Role at the time: Senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, writing a signed article in City Journal

Condemned

Statement summary

Manhattan Institute senior fellow Charles Fain Lehman wrote in City Journal that Krasner has already been reprimanded by another federal judge and seen his conviction-integrity unit constrained by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and that a criminal referral would be the next logical step for an office that seems committed to misleading the courts in the name of its theory of justice.

“The criminal referral would be the next logical step for an office that seems committed to misleading the courts in the name of its theory of justice.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Progressive Prosecutors Have a Crime Problem All Their OwnParagraphs beginning "It's not clear if the U.S. Attorney's office will take up the request" through "theory of justice"
Why we used this label

Lehman says the referral is the next logical step for an office that seems committed to misleading the courts, so we labeled it Condemned.

Portrait of Charles Fain Lehman

Charles Fain Lehman

Role at the time: Manhattan Institute fellow and Atlantic contributor

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Lehman argued that networked license-plate readers can help police investigate crime and should remain available with privacy regulation, rather than be banned.

“Privacy concerns can be best addressed through smart regulation, not bans.”
Why we used this label

Lehman directly defends keeping ALPR networks in use and calls bans an overreaction.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage