Charles Fain Lehman says the referral is the next step for an office "committed to misleading the courts"

Charles Fain LehmanSenior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, writing a signed article in City Journal

Manhattan Institute senior fellow Charles Fain Lehman wrote in City Journal that Krasner has already been reprimanded by another federal judge and seen his conviction-integrity unit constrained by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and that a criminal referral would be the next logical step for an office that seems committed to misleading the courts in the name of its theory of justice.

“The criminal referral would be the next logical step for an office that seems committed to misleading the courts in the name of its theory of justice.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Progressive Prosecutors Have a Crime Problem All Their OwnParagraphs beginning "It's not clear if the U.S. Attorney's office will take up the request" through "theory of justice"
Larry Krasner
Credit: Michael Candelori

Where this statement fits

Did Larry Krasner Pressure Staff to Mislead a Federal Judge About a Murder-Conviction Appeal?

A federal judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found that Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner and Matthew Stiegler, chief of his office's Conviction Integrity Unit, may have pressured subordinate prosecutors to blame a departed colleague and present a false account to the court about an internal dispute over a 2022 concession in a habeas corpus case, and referred Krasner, Stiegler, and the District Attorney's Office to the U.S. Attorney's Office for investigation. Krasner disputes the judge's findings and says he will appeal.

Read the full case

Source and context

Analysis

Progressive Prosecutors Have a Crime Problem All Their Own (opens in a new tab)Paragraphs beginning "It's not clear if the U.S. Attorney's office will take up the request" through "theory of justice"

About this source

Signed opinion article in City Journal, adapted from the magazine's Substack. It summarizes Judge Diamond's referral and compares Krasner with other progressive prosecutors who have faced federal scrutiny.

Before the quotation

The article, adapted from City Journal's Substack, appeared two days after Judge Diamond referred Krasner, Stiegler and the District Attorney's Office to the U.S. Attorney's Office.

After the quotation

The article goes on to list other progressive prosecutors who have drawn federal scrutiny, including Marilyn Mosby, Kim Gardner and Rachael Rollins.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Lehman describes the referral as the next step for an office he says seems committed to misleading the courts, which is his own evaluation of the conduct at issue. The closest competing label is “Mixed or conditional”, because he notes it is unclear whether the U.S. Attorney will act. That loses because the uncertainty concerns the prosecutors' decision, not his assessment of Krasner's conduct.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Larry Krasner

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Charles Fain Lehman says the referral is the next step for an office "committed to misleading the courts"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1363-manhattan-institute-senior-fellow-charles-fain-lehman-wrote

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Charles Fain Lehman says the referral is the next step for an office "committed to misleading the courts"". First published: 2026-09-21. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1363-manhattan-institute-senior-fellow-charles-fain-lehman-wrote