Marlow criticizes Flock's concern for its own privacy and says efforts to protect Flock's privacy would be better spent protecting the privacy of everybody else.
Why we used this label
The reference point is whether Flock should require Michael to remove his surveillance-camera map. Marlow told the Daily Caller News Foundation that it is ridiculous for a company that does not care about other people's privacy to be suddenly worried about its own, and that efforts to protect Flock's privacy would be better spent protecting everyone else's. That rejects the takedown push and fits Condemned. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, which would fit a dispute over how the map is described without rejecting its removal.