Bradley P. Moss

Bradley P. Moss is a Washington, D.C., attorney and partner at the Law Office of Mark S. Zaid. His practice covers national security, federal employment, security clearances and government transparency. He also comments on legal matters in news interviews. He graduated from American University's Washington College of Law in 2006 and earned his undergraduate degree in international relations at George Washington University in 2003.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Bradley P. Moss on January 6 Attack, Law Enforcement, and U.S. Politics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Bradley P. Moss

Bradley P. Moss

Role at the time: National security attorney and CNN interview guest

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Bradley Moss told CNN on December 5, 2025 that the arrest of Brian Cole Jr. defeated the theories, including those voiced by Dan Bongino and Kash Patel, that someone at the FBI or the Capitol Police planted the pipe bombs. He added that this assumes Cole is proven in court to be the person responsible.

“this defeated all of the theories, all the conspiracies for the last four years about who this particular pipe bomber could have been. Assuming of course, this person is actually proven in a court of law to have been that person. All the theories that the Trump team, that Dan Bongino, that Kash Patel, everybody was saying was this was an inside job. This was somebody at the bureau. This was someone from the Capitol Police.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Bradley Moss comments on the pipe-bomb arrest · CNNCNN News Central, December 5, 2025, 1:30 p.m. ET; Bradley Moss interview between the 13:35:35 and 13:40 markers.
Why we used this label

The case classifies responses to Bongino's accusation that FBI officials knew the bomber's identity and concealed an inside operation. Moss said the arrest of Brian Cole Jr. defeated the inside-job theories that Bongino and others had advanced, and added that this assumes Cole is proven in court to be the person responsible. That rejects the accusation but states a condition on doing so, so we labeled it Mixed or conditional. Challenged the characterization is the closest competing label; it loses because he expressly conditions the conclusion on a court's finding.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.