Loading record
Public disputes concerning the 2026 U.S. midterm election cycle, including campaigns, candidates, conventions, advertising, endorsements, and election-related policy promises.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
4 statements on this page. Dates: June 3, 2026 to October 5, 2026
4 matching statements. Dates: June 3, 2026 to October 5, 2026
4 published statements. Dates: June 3, 2026 to October 5, 2026
4 published statements. Dates: June 3, 2026 to October 5, 2026
4 statements on this page. Dates: June 3, 2026 to October 5, 2026
Role at the time: U.S. senator from California
Response to this claim
Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."
“And if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost.”
Sen. Adam Schiff's post on his Senate X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.
The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Schiff reads the remark as Trump accepting attacks on two American cities as a cost of the war and criticizes him for it, which asserts the critics' reading. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because the sentence begins with "if"; but the condition restates what Schiff takes Trump to have said, and the post's conclusion about Trump is not conditional. Evidence: Schiff's own post on X.
Role at the time: U.S. Senator, California
Statement summary
Adam Schiff voted yea on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.
“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Official Senate roll call on H.Con.Res. 89, a concurrent resolution directing the President under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. Rejected 49-50 on September 24, 2026. Fetterman was the only Democratic nay; Republicans Collins, Murkowski, Paul and Tillis voted yea; Alsobrooks did not vote.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Voted to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to end U.S. involvement absent congressional authorization.
Role at the time: U.S. Senator, California
Statement summary
Adam Schiff voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 86, the Senate resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Official Senate roll call on H.Con.Res. 86, directing the President under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. Agreed to 50-48 on June 23, 2026 — the first Iran war powers resolution to pass both chambers. Republicans Cassidy, Collins, Murkowski and Paul voted yea; Fetterman was the only Democratic nay.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.
Role at the time: U.S. senator from California
Statement summary
Schiff calls potential use of ICE or CBP to suppress voting a threat and says Senate Democrats are preparing responses.
“could be used to intimidate voters and depress turnout”
The issuing person or organization explains its position and the actions it took.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)He opposes using immigration agents to suppress voting.
