Powell emphasizes limits on compelled testimony

Lewis F. Powell Jr.U.S. Supreme Court justice, concurring

Mixed or conditional

Powell joins the Court's opinion while stressing remedies for bad-faith investigations, testimony remote from the investigation, and source demands without a legitimate law-enforcement need.

“I add this brief statement to emphasize what seems to me to be the limited nature of the Court's holding.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665: full opinions · Supreme Court of the United StatesSyllabus page 665; majority pages 667-709; Powell pages 709-710; Douglas pages 711-725; Stewart pages 725-752

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The west facade and columns of the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C.
Credit: Claire Anderson / Wikimedia Commons (CC0)

Where this statement fits

Was Branzburg v. Hayes right to require reporters' grand-jury testimony?

The Supreme Court rejected a claimed First Amendment privilege to withhold relevant testimony from good-faith grand-jury investigations. Justice Byron White defended that result, Justice Potter Stewart warned it would impair confidential newsgathering, and Justice Lewis Powell stressed limits protecting reporters against improper demands.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665: full opinions (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United StatesSyllabus page 665; majority pages 667-709; Powell pages 709-710; Douglas pages 711-725; Stewart pages 725-752

About this source

The Court and separate opinions address journalists' testimony in grand-jury investigations and the limits of constitutional source protection.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Powell joins White's majority opinion.

After the quotation

He says reporters retain constitutional rights and may move to quash improper demands. A footnote rejects the dissent's three proposed preconditions.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Powell supports compelled testimony subject to express protections against improper demands.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Supreme Court of the United States

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Lewis F. Powell Jr., Powell emphasizes limits on compelled testimonyDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Powell emphasizes limits on compelled testimony
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/8178-powell-joins-the-court-s-opinion-while-stressing

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Powell emphasizes limits on compelled testimony". First published: 2026-11-04. Last updated: 2026-11-04. https://disputeindex.com/events/8178-powell-joins-the-court-s-opinion-while-stressing