White defends requiring relevant grand-jury testimony

Byron R. WhiteU.S. Supreme Court justice, writing the majority opinion

Defended or excused

White concludes that requiring newsmen to appear and testify in the proceedings at issue does not abridge First Amendment speech and press protections.

“We hold that it does not.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665: full opinions · Supreme Court of the United StatesSyllabus page 665; majority pages 667-709; Powell pages 709-710; Douglas pages 711-725; Stewart pages 725-752

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The west facade and columns of the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C.
Credit: Claire Anderson / Wikimedia Commons (CC0)

Where this statement fits

Was Branzburg v. Hayes right to require reporters' grand-jury testimony?

The Supreme Court rejected a claimed First Amendment privilege to withhold relevant testimony from good-faith grand-jury investigations. Justice Byron White defended that result, Justice Potter Stewart warned it would impair confidential newsgathering, and Justice Lewis Powell stressed limits protecting reporters against improper demands.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665: full opinions (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United StatesSyllabus page 665; majority pages 667-709; Powell pages 709-710; Douglas pages 711-725; Stewart pages 725-752

About this source

The Court and separate opinions address journalists' testimony in grand-jury investigations and the limits of constitutional source protection.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

White asks whether requiring newsmen to appear and testify before state or federal grand juries abridges speech and press freedom.

After the quotation

The opinion turns to the facts of the proceedings. Later, it says grand juries are subject to judicial control.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

White expressly upholds the compelled testimony at issue.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Supreme Court of the United States

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Byron R. White, White defends requiring relevant grand-jury testimonyDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
White defends requiring relevant grand-jury testimony
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/8177-white-concludes-that-requiring-newsmen-to-appear-and

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "White defends requiring relevant grand-jury testimony". First published: 2026-11-04. Last updated: 2026-11-04. https://disputeindex.com/events/8177-white-concludes-that-requiring-newsmen-to-appear-and