Alito would grant the government’s stay request

Samuel AlitoSupreme Court associate justice, dissenting

Alito would allow enforcement while the injunction is appealed.

“I would grant the Government’s application”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Supreme Court stay denial, Kavanaugh concurrence and Alito dissent: USPS v. California · Supreme Court of the United StatesPDF p.1: concurrence; pp.2–9: dissent and Thomas’s express joinder
Mail In Voting
Credit: ShanaKFriend

Where this statement fits

Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?

USPS’s new federal ballot-mail rule requires election officials to meet envelope standards, enroll voters through a federal portal and submit outgoing ballots for verification. The Trump administration argues these are lawful anti-fraud postal controls. Challenging states and civil-rights organizations say USPS is intruding into state-run elections and that the late rollout threatens voters’ access. On September 14, the Supreme Court left a temporary block in place for the 2026 election. Alito and Thomas would have allowed enforcement; Kavanaugh objected to applying the rule this year.

Read the full case

Case updates

Next steps for the blocked USPS ballot-mail rule

Get an email if courts rule on the broader challenge to the rule, or if the administration or USPS moves to apply it to later elections.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Supreme Court stay denial, Kavanaugh concurrence and Alito dissent: USPS v. California (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United StatesPDF p.1: concurrence; pp.2–9: dissent and Thomas’s express joinder

About this source

The Court denies a stay of the preliminary injunction. Kavanaugh objects to applying the rule in 2026; Alito would grant the stay and Thomas joins him. This is emergency relief, not final disposition of every challenge to the executive order.

Before the quotation

The government seeks a stay of the November injunction.

After the quotation

His dissent argues the government has a strong case under postal statutes.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Defends 2026 enforcement by supporting a stay.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Samuel Alito, Alito would grant the government’s stay requestDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Alito would grant the government’s stay request
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/631-alito-would-allow-enforcement-while-the-injunction-is

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Alito would grant the government’s stay request". First published: 2026-09-15. Last updated: 2026-09-15. https://disputeindex.com/events/631-alito-would-allow-enforcement-while-the-injunction-is