Clements calls the bill a good but insufficient step
Allison ClementsFormer FERC commissioner and principal of 804 Advisory
Clements calls the bill a good step but says it is not close to sufficient for the challenges it addresses.
“Is it a good step? Yes. Is it anywhere close to sufficient relative to these challenges? No”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Would Jon Husted's Ratepayer Protection Act protect households from data-center costs?
Jon Husted and the bill's House sponsors say the Ratepayer Protection Act would stop households from paying for infrastructure needed by large data centers. Critics question whether requiring regulators to consider protective standards would deliver that result.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Rachel Frazin reports direct interviews with Allison Clements and John Hickenlooper and compares the legislation with the protections its sponsors describe.
Before the quotation
Clements says some requirements may duplicate duties that regulators already have.
After the quotation
The article explains that the bill requires consideration of a cost-recovery standard, rather than compulsory adoption.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
She combines support for the measure with a substantive rejection of its adequacy on the same consumer-protection question.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseHusted says his bill makes data centers pay their fair share
“My bill ensures that large data centers pay their fair share of electricity costs, infrastructure costs that they require, requiring them to own the responsibility for those costs rather than shifting them to other ratepayers.”Read statement
Hickenlooper says the Ratepayer Protection Act has no teeth
“It’s got no teeth in it”Read statement
Castor backs the Ratepayer Protection Act's consumer protections
“The Ratepayer Protection Act safeguards consumers by ensuring these data centers pay for the energy and grid upgrades they need so hardworking families and local businesses are not stuck paying more”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Clements calls the bill a good but insufficient step
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6067-clements-calls-the-bill-a-good-step-but
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Clements calls the bill a good but insufficient step". First published: 2026-10-19. Last updated: 2026-10-19. https://disputeindex.com/events/6067-clements-calls-the-bill-a-good-step-but