Castor backs the Ratepayer Protection Act's consumer protections
Kathy CastorU.S. representative from Florida and co-introducer of the House companion bill
Castor backs the bill as a way to keep families and businesses from paying for data-center energy needs.
“The Ratepayer Protection Act safeguards consumers by ensuring these data centers pay for the energy and grid upgrades they need so hardworking families and local businesses are not stuck paying more”
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Would Jon Husted's Ratepayer Protection Act protect households from data-center costs?
Jon Husted and the bill's House sponsors say the Ratepayer Protection Act would stop households from paying for infrastructure needed by large data centers. Critics question whether requiring regulators to consider protective standards would deliver that result.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
The Senate sponsor's announcement includes his statement and quotations from House sponsors Gabe Evans and Kathy Castor.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Castor says her Florida neighbors face rising electric bills and should not subsidize wealthy corporations' growing energy demand.
After the quotation
The announcement describes a requirement for states to consider standards under which large electricity users would pay for their infrastructure costs.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Castor endorses adopting the Ratepayer Protection Act, the proposal examined in this case. She argues that it would protect families and local businesses from data-center costs. That is a defense of the proposed law's merits.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseHusted says his bill makes data centers pay their fair share
“My bill ensures that large data centers pay their fair share of electricity costs, infrastructure costs that they require, requiring them to own the responsibility for those costs rather than shifting them to other ratepayers.”Read statement
Clements calls the bill a good but insufficient step
“Is it a good step? Yes. Is it anywhere close to sufficient relative to these challenges? No”Read statement
Hickenlooper says the Ratepayer Protection Act has no teeth
“It’s got no teeth in it”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Castor backs the Ratepayer Protection Act's consumer protections
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6065-castor-backs-the-bill-as-a-way-to
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Castor backs the Ratepayer Protection Act's consumer protections". First published: 2026-10-19. Last updated: 2026-10-19. https://disputeindex.com/events/6065-castor-backs-the-bill-as-a-way-to