Evans backs the Ratepayer Protection Act to protect electricity customers
Gabe EvansU.S. representative from Colorado and House sponsor
Evans says the bill protects everyday Americans while helping the country compete in AI.
“The Ratepayer Protection Act is a bipartisan, commonsense solution that protects everyday Americans and ensures our nation can continue to win the AI race”
Official statement

Where this statement fits
Would Jon Husted's Ratepayer Protection Act protect households from data-center costs?
Jon Husted and the bill's House sponsors say the Ratepayer Protection Act would stop households from paying for infrastructure needed by large data centers. Critics question whether requiring regulators to consider protective standards would deliver that result.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
The Senate sponsor's announcement includes his statement and quotations from House sponsors Gabe Evans and Kathy Castor.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Evans says families and small businesses should not cover new power-generation costs driven by data centers.
After the quotation
The announcement says the bill would require states to consider cost-recovery standards for large electricity users. It describes those standards as a way to keep data-center infrastructure costs off other customers' bills.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The action being evaluated is adopting the Ratepayer Protection Act. Evans argues that it is a justified consumer safeguard and should be adopted. His support is for this proposal, rather than a separate claim or remedy.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseHusted says his bill makes data centers pay their fair share
“My bill ensures that large data centers pay their fair share of electricity costs, infrastructure costs that they require, requiring them to own the responsibility for those costs rather than shifting them to other ratepayers.”Read statement
Clements calls the bill a good but insufficient step
“Is it a good step? Yes. Is it anywhere close to sufficient relative to these challenges? No”Read statement
Hickenlooper says the Ratepayer Protection Act has no teeth
“It’s got no teeth in it”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Evans backs the Ratepayer Protection Act to protect electricity customers
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6064-evans-says-the-bill-protects-everyday-americans-while
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Evans backs the Ratepayer Protection Act to protect electricity customers". First published: 2026-10-19. Last updated: 2026-10-19. https://disputeindex.com/events/6064-evans-says-the-bill-protects-everyday-americans-while