Kennedy rejects bans on corporate political speech in Citizens United

Anthony M. KennedySupreme Court associate justice, writing the majority opinion

Kennedy's majority permits disclosure and disclaimer requirements but rejects suppressing corporate political speech.

“The Government may regulate corporate political speech through disclaimer and disclosure requirements, but it may not suppress that speech altogether.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Citizens United: Kennedy opinion of the CourtOpening and Parts III-IV
The west facade and columns of the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington.
Credit: Claire Anderson / CC0

Where this statement fits

Citizens United: Corporate election spending and free speech

The Supreme Court protected corporate and union independent election spending in Citizens United. Defenders say the ruling protects political speech and association. Critics say it gives wealthy interests excessive influence and undermines democratic accountability.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Citizens United: Kennedy opinion of the Court (opens in a new tab)Opening and Parts III-IV

About this source

The opinion protects independent corporate and union political spending while permitting disclosure and disclaimer requirements.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Kennedy writes that the Court was asked to reconsider Austin and, in effect, McConnell, and holds that stare decisis does not compel continued acceptance of Austin.

After the quotation

The opinion then turns to the facts, beginning with Citizens United's January 2008 film Hillary: The Movie.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Kennedy's majority upholds protection for corporate political speech. Allowing disclosure requirements does not reverse that support for the ruling.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Anthony M. Kennedy, Kennedy rejects bans on corporate political speech in Citizens UnitedDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Kennedy rejects bans on corporate political speech in Citizens United
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6039-kennedy-s-majority-permits-disclosure-and-disclaimer-requirements

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Kennedy rejects bans on corporate political speech in Citizens United". First published: 2026-10-19. Last updated: 2026-10-19. https://disputeindex.com/events/6039-kennedy-s-majority-permits-disclosure-and-disclaimer-requirements