El-Sayed says Israel and Iran pose different dangers

Abdul El-SayedMichigan Democratic Senate candidate

El-Sayed calls the question of which country is the bigger threat ridiculous and says Israel and Iran have each proven dangerous to the United States in different ways.

“I think both of them have proven dangerous in their own way.”

Original video

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)WOOD TV8 video of the October 8 Michigan Senate debate: the Israel or Iran question29:56-32:15 Albin plays El-Sayed's earlier NewsNation answer, asks twice whether Israel or Iran is the bigger threat, and El-Sayed answers (final answer at 32:06)

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)LGBTQ Nation reports El-Sayed and Buttigieg's answers about Israel and IranEl-Sayed clip, Buttigieg's answer and continued support for El-Sayed

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)The Daily Wire reports Buttigieg's disagreement with El-SayedOctober 8 debate answer and October 14 Fox interview quotations
Abdul El-Sayed and Pete Buttigieg in separate photographic panels divided by a torn-paper edge.
Credit: Conlan Houston; U.S. Department of Transportation. Composite: Dispute Index with OpenAI.

Where this statement fits

Abdul El-Sayed describes dangers from Israel and Iran; Pete Buttigieg draws an ally-enemy distinction

Abdul El-Sayed declined to rank Israel and Iran as threats during Michigan's Senate debate, describing different dangers from each. Pete Buttigieg answered that Iran is an enemy and Israel an ally, while saying he would still vote for El-Sayed.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original video

WOOD TV8 video of the October 8 Michigan Senate debate: the Israel or Iran question (opens in a new tab)29:56-32:15 Albin plays El-Sayed's earlier NewsNation answer, asks twice whether Israel or Iran is the bigger threat, and El-Sayed answers (final answer at 32:06)

About this source

WOOD TV8's recording of the Grand Rapids debate between Abdul El-Sayed and Mike Rogers, moderated by Rick Albin. Albin played El-Sayed's earlier answer to NewsNation, then twice asked whether Israel or Iran was the bigger threat to the United States. El-Sayed called the question ridiculous, said Israel had lobbied the United States to go to war with Iran, and said both countries had proven dangerous in their own way.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

LGBTQ Nation reports El-Sayed and Buttigieg's answers about Israel and Iran (opens in a new tab)El-Sayed clip, Buttigieg's answer and continued support for El-Sayed

About this source

Daniel Villarreal quotes both answers and Buttigieg's explanation that he will still vote for El-Sayed. The article contains commentary as well as reporting.

Reporting

The Daily Wire reports Buttigieg's disagreement with El-Sayed (opens in a new tab)October 8 debate answer and October 14 Fox interview quotations

About this source

Drew Berkemeyer reports the competing answers and Buttigieg's continued electoral support. El-Sayed describes different dangers rather than explicitly calling the countries equal threats.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Moderator Rick Albin played El-Sayed's earlier answer to NewsNation, in which he called the question dumb, and asked again whether Israel or Iran was the bigger threat to the United States. El-Sayed called it a ridiculous hypothetical. He said Israel had lobbied the United States to go to war with Iran, that Iran had responded by bombing countries across the Middle East and choking off the world's energy supply, and that he did not consider a country that takes the United States into wars it need not fight an ally. He said that made both countries kind of dangerous. Albin then asked a final time.

After the quotation

He then said one country was at risk of attacking the United States and the other was getting it into wars it had no business fighting. His earlier remarks tie the first to Iran and the second to Israel. He did not name either country as the greater threat or call the two equal.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Reference point: El-Sayed's refusal to rank Israel and Iran as threats and his comparison of the dangers they pose. Defended or excused: this is that answer, given and explained by El-Sayed, who repeats the comparison when pressed a final time. Explicitly stayed out is the closest competing label, since he called the question ridiculous and would not pick a country, but it loses because he went on to say both had proven dangerous rather than refusing to address the matter.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Abdul El-Sayed, El-Sayed says Israel and Iran pose different dangersDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
El-Sayed says Israel and Iran pose different dangers
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5888-el-sayed-calls-the-question-of-which-country

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "El-Sayed says Israel and Iran pose different dangers". First published: 2026-10-18. Last updated: 2026-10-18. https://disputeindex.com/events/5888-el-sayed-calls-the-question-of-which-country