Justice Department says Herrera-Salazar's two prosecutions charged separate offenses

United States Department of JusticeFederal department prosecuting the case, in the Solicitor General's brief opposing Supreme Court review

The Justice Department, in the Solicitor General's brief opposing Supreme Court review, said the Tenth Circuit correctly held that Herrera-Salazar's Texas and Oklahoma indictments charged separate offenses under the illegal-reentry statute, and that further review was unwarranted.

“Further review is unwarranted. ... After considering the statutory text, the court of appeals correctly determined that the indictment in the Southern District of Texas and the indictment in the Eastern District of Oklahoma charged petitioner with separate offenses.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Brief for the United States in opposition, Herrera-Salazar v. United States · United States Department of JusticeBrief for the United States in Opposition, Herrera-Salazar v. United States, No. 25-6989 (U.S. filed June 5, 2026).
The U.S. Supreme Court Building's west facade and columns in Washington.
Credit: Claire Anderson / CC0

Where this statement fits

Supreme Court declines a double-jeopardy appeal over a second illegal-reentry conviction, with Sotomayor and Gorsuch questioning it

Jesus Herrera-Salazar was convicted in 2020 of being found in the United States after removal, and was convicted of the same crime again in 2024 after police stopped him in Oklahoma while his supervised release barred him from leaving that district. The Tenth Circuit held that the two prosecutions charged separate offenses. On October 13, 2026, the Supreme Court declined to review the case. Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Gorsuch, agreed with the denial but wrote that the second conviction is difficult to square with the Double Jeopardy Clause. The Justice Department had argued that the lower court correctly treated each prosecution as a separate offense.

Read the full case

Case updates

Following double-jeopardy challenges to repeat illegal-reentry charges

Follow later court rulings and responses on whether a removed person can be charged again for being found in the United States while under supervision.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Brief for the United States in opposition, Herrera-Salazar v. United States (opens in a new tab) · United States Department of JusticeBrief for the United States in Opposition, Herrera-Salazar v. United States, No. 25-6989 (U.S. filed June 5, 2026).

About this source

The Justice Department's brief opposing Supreme Court review of Herrera-Salazar's second illegal-reentry conviction. It argues the Tenth Circuit correctly held that his Texas and Oklahoma indictments charged separate offenses.

Before the quotation

The Justice Department first waived its right to respond to the petition, and filed this brief after the Supreme Court requested a response in April 2026.

After the quotation

The brief was filed on June 5, 2026, by Solicitor General D. John Sauer and Justice Department attorneys.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is the federal government's second prosecution and conviction of Jesus Herrera-Salazar for being found in the United States, brought while the terms of his first sentence barred him from leaving the country. The Justice Department argues that the lower court correctly treated the two indictments as separate offenses and that the Supreme Court should not review the case, so we used Defended or excused. The closest competing label is Challenged characterization, because it disputes that the charges were for the same offense; it loses because it defends the second prosecution itself.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Sotomayor says Herrera-Salazar's second conviction raises serious double-jeopardy problems

Sonia Sotomayor

“After being once convicted and punished for being found in the United States and, as part of his original sentence, prohibited from leaving the United States, Herrera-Salazar was convicted and punished for being found in the United States a second time. ... Should circumstances like these arise again, I encourage courts to avoid the constitutional absurdity that occurred here and give the Double Jeopardy Clause its full weight and meaning.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: United States Department of Justice, Justice Department says Herrera-Salazar's two prosecutions charged separate offensesDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Justice Department says Herrera-Salazar's two prosecutions charged separate offenses
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5744-the-justice-department-in-the-solicitor-general-s

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Justice Department says Herrera-Salazar's two prosecutions charged separate offenses". First published: 2026-10-14. Last updated: 2026-10-14. https://disputeindex.com/events/5744-the-justice-department-in-the-solicitor-general-s