DOJ criticizes Apple's resistance to the San Bernardino unlocking order

United States Department of JusticeU.S. Department of Justice, brief filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California

In its reply brief, DOJ criticizes Apple's rhetoric and argues that the court can compel the company to assist in unlocking the phone.

“Apple’s rhetoric is not only false, but also corrosive of the very institutions that are best able to safeguard our liberty and our rights”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)DOJ reply opposing Apple's motion to vacate the San Bernardino assistance order · United States Department of JusticeCase 5:16-cm-00010-SP, document 149, March 10, 2016; introduction, PDF pages 9-10

Where this statement fits

Was Apple right to refuse to create software to unlock the San Bernardino iPhone?

Apple opposed creating software to bypass safeguards on a seized San Bernardino iPhone. The government sought to compel its assistance under a court order. The proceeding ended when investigators obtained access without Apple and the order was vacated; the court did not resolve the disputed authority on the merits.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

DOJ reply opposing Apple's motion to vacate the San Bernardino assistance order (opens in a new tab) · United States Department of JusticeCase 5:16-cm-00010-SP, document 149, March 10, 2016; introduction, PDF pages 9-10

About this source

Original government reply brief opposing Apple's motion to vacate the compelled-assistance order. The filed court document is reproduced by Just Security.

Before the quotation

The government's reply opposes Apple's motion to vacate the February 16 assistance order.

After the quotation

The brief argues that the All Writs Act and precedent permit the court to compel Apple's assistance.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case concerns Apple's refusal to create bypass software. DOJ condemns that resistance by criticizing its supporting rhetoric and asking the court to reject Apple's motion to vacate.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
DOJ criticizes Apple's resistance to the San Bernardino unlocking order
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5546-in-its-reply-brief-doj-criticizes-apple-s

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "DOJ criticizes Apple's resistance to the San Bernardino unlocking order". First published: 2026-10-11. Last updated: 2026-10-11. https://disputeindex.com/events/5546-in-its-reply-brief-doj-criticizes-apple-s