CDT supports Apple's challenge to the unlocking order

Center for Democracy & TechnologyCenter for Democracy & Technology, institutional legal position

CDT says its brief supports Apple because an order to create software defeating its own security exceeds the All Writs Act and would reduce trust in connected devices.

“The Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) has filed an amicus brief in support of Apple in its challenge to the FBI order”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)CDT Files Brief in Support of Apple - Center for Democracy and Technology · Center for Democracy & TechnologyStatement text

Where this statement fits

Was Apple right to refuse to create software to unlock the San Bernardino iPhone?

Apple opposed creating software to bypass safeguards on a seized San Bernardino iPhone. The government sought to compel its assistance under a court order. The proceeding ended when investigators obtained access without Apple and the order was vacated; the court did not resolve the disputed authority on the merits.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

CDT Files Brief in Support of Apple - Center for Democracy and Technology (opens in a new tab) · Center for Democracy & TechnologyStatement text

About this source

CDT's account of the arguments in its brief supporting Apple.

Before the quotation

CDT announced a brief in the San Bernardino case supporting Apple's challenge.

After the quotation

CDT says it will challenge rulings that would allow the government to compel companies to weaken their products' security.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

CDT argues that forcing Apple to defeat its security measures is legally impermissible and would undermine device security. This supplies a legal and security defense of Apple's refusal to create bypass software.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
CDT supports Apple's challenge to the unlocking order
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5547-cdt-says-its-brief-supports-apple-because-an

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "CDT supports Apple's challenge to the unlocking order". First published: 2026-10-11. Last updated: 2026-10-11. https://disputeindex.com/events/5547-cdt-says-its-brief-supports-apple-because-an