Government seeks to compel Apple after its refusal

United States Department of JusticeU.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California

The government asks the court to enforce the assistance order, arguing that the warrant and technical limits justify the requested help.

Responding to

Compelling Apple to create software bypassing iPhone safeguards would exceed the government's proper authority and threaten security beyond this investigation.

“Action: Filed a motion asking the court to compel Apple to comply with its February 16 assistance order.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Government moves to compel Apple's compliance after its refusal · United States Department of JusticeED No. CM 16-10 (SP); February 19 motion to compel, 35 pages

Where this statement fits

Was Apple right to refuse to create software to unlock the San Bernardino iPhone?

Apple opposed creating software to bypass safeguards on a seized San Bernardino iPhone. The government sought to compel its assistance under a court order. The proceeding ended when investigators obtained access without Apple and the order was vacated; the court did not resolve the disputed authority on the merits.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Government moves to compel Apple's compliance after its refusal (opens in a new tab) · United States Department of JusticeED No. CM 16-10 (SP); February 19 motion to compel, 35 pages

About this source

This motion follows Apple's public refusal and argues for enforcement of the February 16 order. It presents the government's position, not a final judicial ruling.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Apple had publicly objected to creating the requested bypass software after the February 16 order.

After the quotation

The government argues the request is limited to the identified phone. The order was later vacated after access was obtained without Apple.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The motion rejects Apple's refusal and seeks to compel the conduct it withheld. It follows the company's public opposition.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Government seeks to compel Apple after its refusal
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5536-the-government-asks-the-court-to-enforce-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Government seeks to compel Apple after its refusal". First published: 2026-10-11. Last updated: 2026-10-11. https://disputeindex.com/events/5536-the-government-asks-the-court-to-enforce-the