Apple defends refusing to create bypass software

Apple Inc.Company statement signed by CEO Tim Cook

Apple argues that the requested software and precedent could weaken security beyond the seized phone. It distinguishes new software creation from the assistance it had already provided.

Responding to

Compelling Apple to create software bypassing iPhone safeguards would exceed the government's proper authority and threaten security beyond this investigation.

“We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the U.S. government.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Apple's February 2016 customer letter opposing compelled iPhone bypass software · Apple Inc.A Message to Our Customers; February 16, 2016

Where this statement fits

Was Apple right to refuse to create software to unlock the San Bernardino iPhone?

Apple opposed creating software to bypass safeguards on a seized San Bernardino iPhone. The government sought to compel its assistance under a court order. The proceeding ended when investigators obtained access without Apple and the order was vacated; the court did not resolve the disputed authority on the merits.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

Apple's February 2016 customer letter opposing compelled iPhone bypass software (opens in a new tab) · Apple Inc.A Message to Our Customers; February 16, 2016

About this source

Cook explains Apple's refusal to create software to bypass iPhone safeguards. The letter also says Apple had provided data in its possession and engineering assistance.

Before the quotation

A court had ordered assistance with a seized iPhone in the San Bernardino investigation.

After the quotation

Apple says it supplied data in its possession and engineering advice, but objects to creating software that would bypass safeguards.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The company justifies its refusal to create the bypass software, the conduct addressed by this case.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Apple defends refusing to create bypass software
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5535-apple-argues-that-the-requested-software-and-precedent

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Apple defends refusing to create bypass software". First published: 2026-10-11. Last updated: 2026-10-11. https://disputeindex.com/events/5535-apple-argues-that-the-requested-software-and-precedent