Trump cites possible AI guardrails while prioritizing competition

President of the United States, speaking to reporters

We can put guardrails, we can do this and that, but I think you have a lot of negative forces that are bringing it up that ... shouldn’t be bringing it up, and they’re bringing up things that won’t happen. But whoever wins with AI wins.

Source and context

Reporting

Trump comments on AI guardrails, competition and development pace (opens in a new tab)AP lines 1785–1790: Trump’s direct remarks to reporters during his September 13 trip to Ireland; surrounding context identifies the question about slowing or regulating AI.

About this source

Associated Press reports Trump’s response to questions about slowing or regulating AI shortly after Dario Amodei’s pacing proposal. The quoted remarks acknowledge possible guardrails while emphasizing U.S. competition with China; they do not specify a rule, implementation mechanism, or a direct assessment of Anthropic’s conduct.

Before the quotation

AP placed the remarks in Trump’s answer to whether the AI industry should slow development or be regulated, one day after Dario Amodei’s call to let safety measures catch up.

After the quotation

Later that day, AP reported that Trump said he was not downplaying AI risks and described AI as likely to be more good than bad; he repeated the competition framing.

Mixed or conditional
How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional: Trump acknowledged that guardrails could be used but also downplayed some warnings and prioritized winning the AI competition. The statement does not give an unconditional defense of a particular company or a concrete regulatory commitment.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Demis Hassabis

Dario's essay points towards the right path forward. The details need working through, but the direction is correct for meeting this critical moment. This is also why we recently put out our proposal for an industry-wide standards body for frontier AI.
Read statement

David Sacks

If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible. But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission.
Read statement

Sarah Heck

The government has a critical role to play here, including blocking the sale of the most advanced chips to adversarial nations like China, enacting a national law requiring testing of frontier models, with the power to block the most advanced models that prove to be unsafe.
Read statement