El-Sayed disavows Piker's al-Qaeda comparison and says he gives it little weight

Abdul El-SayedDemocratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Michigan, in a statement provided to Axios

After Hasan Piker told Axios that the United States commits more terrorism than al-Qaeda "pound for pound," Abdul El-Sayed said in a statement to Axios that he did not agree and did not give much weight to statements made by a social media streamer, redirecting to what he called the dangerous policies of Donald Trump and Mike Rogers on the cost of gas, groceries and health care. It is the fourth occasion recorded in this case on which El-Sayed has publicly distanced himself from Piker's remarks while the association remains a Republican line of attack.

“I do not agree with this statement, nor do I give much weight to the statements made by a social media streamer. I am more concerned with the dangerous policies of Donald Trump and Mike Rogers that are raising the prices of gas, groceries and healthcare for Michiganders.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)TheWrap: "Hasan Piker Stands by Calling America the 'Top Dog in Terrorism' in Contentious Interview"
Abdul El-Sayed testifying at a United States Senate committee hearing in 2024

Where this statement fits

Mike Rogers’s 9/11 accusation against Abdul El-Sayed

After Michigan’s August 2026 Senate primary, Mike Rogers asserted that Abdul El-Sayed believed America deserved the September 11 attacks. His campaign defended that accusation by citing El-Sayed’s association with Hasan Piker and reluctance to disavow him. El-Sayed had explicitly rejected justifying 9/11 and argued that appearing with a person did not imply agreement. He described Rogers’s attacks as an effort to divide voters through Islamophobia. Pod Save America hosts Jon Favreau and Dan Pfeiffer later debated the strategy and construction of a related Republican ad without endorsing its factual claims.

Read the full case

Case updates

What comes next in Rogers's 9/11 claim about El-Sayed?

Get an email if Rogers repeats or revises the accusation, El-Sayed answers it again, or new ads or fact-checks add to the case.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Reporting

TheWrap: "Hasan Piker Stands by Calling America the 'Top Dog in Terrorism' in Contentious Interview" (opens in a new tab)

About this source

TheWrap report of September 17, 2026 carrying fuller quotation from Piker's Axios interview than the Axios article itself, including his citation of a U.S. missile strike on an elementary school in Minab, Iran, and his statement that the analysis "doesn't justify" the September 11 attacks. It also carries Abdul El-Sayed's full statement to Axios rejecting the comparison, and his separate Fox 2 Detroit debate remarks of September 15 on why he engages with Piker. It notes the Associated Press found evidence at least one U.S. missile struck the school, that the Trump administration has not released the Pentagon investigation's findings, and that the death toll remains unknown; the 140 figure is Piker's.

Before the quotation

Republican-aligned groups have spent nearly $3 million on advertising targeting El-Sayed over his association with Piker, according to AdImpact data reported by Axios, with many of the ads featuring Piker's 2019 remark that "America deserved 9/11." El-Sayed had addressed the association at a Fox 2 Detroit debate two days earlier.

After the quotation

Piker's claim itself, and El-Sayed's rejection of it on the merits, are recorded in the separate case on that comparison. Rogers has continued to tie the two, saying at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas that "Abdul El-Sayed has chosen Hasan as his running mate."

How this statement is classified

Challenged the characterization

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

El-Sayed does not address the accusation directly here; he disputes the inference it rests on, by disavowing Piker's newest remark and denying that a streamer's statements carry weight for him. That is a challenge to the attributed linkage rather than a substantive evaluation of Rogers's accusation. The closest competing label is “Mixed or conditional”, which is how his September 15 debate answer (753) is classified because he disavowed specific remarks while defending the broader association; it loses here because this statement offers no defence of the association at all. “Explicitly stayed out” also loses: unlike his September 13 "Face the Nation" answer (752), he engages with the substance before redirecting.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Hasan Piker

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Abdul El-Sayed, El-Sayed disavows Piker's al-Qaeda comparison and says he gives it little weightDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
El-Sayed disavows Piker's al-Qaeda comparison and says he gives it little weight
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/957-after-hasan-piker-told-axios-that-the-united

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "El-Sayed disavows Piker's al-Qaeda comparison and says he gives it little weight". First published: 2026-09-17. Last updated: 2026-09-25. https://disputeindex.com/events/957-after-hasan-piker-told-axios-that-the-united