Chuck Schumer demands Flock delete personal data not tied to a crime and disclose federal access
Chuck SchumerSenate Democratic leader, in a letter to Flock Safety's chief executive and a press release announcing it
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer wrote to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley that personal data not tied to a crime should be deleted from Flock's servers, and pressed the company on its National Lookup Tool, reports of hacked cameras and misuse of plate readers, and whether any federal agency has accessed its data.
“At a minimum, personal data not tied to a crime should be deleted from Flock's servers.”
Original text
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
Schumer's letter to Flock Group CEO Garrett Langley, dated October 5, 2026, asking ten written questions on data retention, the National Lookup Tool, federal access, auditing, device security and artificial intelligence, with responses requested by October 16, 2026. His office's press release about the letter is dated October 4.
Official statement
About this source
Press release from Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer's office announcing his letter to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley, with quotes from Schumer and from the letter. Schumer's press office also emailed the release to Dispute Index on October 5, 2026. The letter's full text was not posted with the release.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Schumer's letter, dated October 5, asks Flock to answer ten questions by October 16, including how much New York data it stores, its retention policy and exceptions, which federal agencies have accessed Flock data directly or through local police, and what auditing catches improper searches. He wrote that the National Lookup Tool lets agencies "search data collected far outside their own jurisdictions."
After the quotation
He closed, "Law abiding Americans should not have to sacrifice their right to privacy simply by driving down a public street." His office's press release, dated October 4, quotes him as saying, "Any federal agency using this network to track Americans exercising their rights in our own state is unacceptable," and, citing a hacked camera, "The next step here is simple: turn the lens around and zoom in on Flock."
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case asks whether Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks should exist. Schumer criticizes the network as a tracking system with no rules or consent and calls federal use of it to track Americans exercising their rights "unacceptable," so we labeled it Condemned. His concrete demand is that Flock delete personal data not tied to a crime and disclose who has accessed it, a limit on retention and use rather than a ban, so we placed it at Limit on the remedy ladder.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseFatehi calls for national regulation and rejects an interim ban
“we need sensible regulation, we need national sensible regulation, but not regulation that either regulates the system out of existence or that requires a ban in the meantime.”Read statement
Jordan calls for unplugging cameras until they can be deployed securely
“And to me, just from the stuff that I’ve, I’ve shown on my channel, this is a solid risk-based argument in itself to unplug the cameras until we could figure out how to deploy them securely.”Read statement
Gluba says Flock and other license plate cameras violate the Fourth Amendment and should be removed
“They are a complete violation of community privacy and safety, they are in direct violation of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and should by law be removed immediately. They have been abused throughout the country by various LEOs and citizens alike as they have little to no security in their software. Every other day we see a new article about someone using a LPR camera system to spy on and track an ex girlfriend or boyfriend, or we see that someone has again used them to track children. They must be removed!”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Chuck Schumer demands Flock delete personal data not tied to a crime and disclose federal access
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4659-senate-democratic-leader-chuck-schumer-wrote-to-flock
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Chuck Schumer demands Flock delete personal data not tied to a crime and disclose federal access". First published: 2026-10-05. Last updated: 2026-10-05. https://disputeindex.com/events/4659-senate-democratic-leader-chuck-schumer-wrote-to-flock