Blakeman endorsed readers at Nassau County's boundary
Bruce BlakemanNassau County executive
Blakeman endorsed readers at the county boundary.
“We are installing technology along the border of New York City that will read license plates,”
Reporting

Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Blakeman spoke as Nassau County executive.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Fox News published Blakeman's county-executive interview on November 24, 2025. The date shown here is the report's publication date; the recording date was not specified.
After the quotation
The passage concerns a county deployment.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to continued networked surveillance, an affirmative deployment commitment supports keeping the technology. This is a dated local position, with no statewide remedy established.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseFatehi calls for national regulation and rejects an interim ban
“we need sensible regulation, we need national sensible regulation, but not regulation that either regulates the system out of existence or that requires a ban in the meantime.”Read statement
Jordan calls for unplugging cameras until they can be deployed securely
“And to me, just from the stuff that I’ve, I’ve shown on my channel, this is a solid risk-based argument in itself to unplug the cameras until we could figure out how to deploy them securely.”Read statement
Gluba says Flock and other license plate cameras violate the Fourth Amendment and should be removed
“They are a complete violation of community privacy and safety, they are in direct violation of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and should by law be removed immediately. They have been abused throughout the country by various LEOs and citizens alike as they have little to no security in their software. Every other day we see a new article about someone using a LPR camera system to spy on and track an ex girlfriend or boyfriend, or we see that someone has again used them to track children. They must be removed!”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Blakeman endorsed readers at Nassau County's boundary
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3626-blakeman-endorsed-readers-at-the-county-boundary
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Blakeman endorsed readers at Nassau County's boundary". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3626-blakeman-endorsed-readers-at-the-county-boundary