Flock favors regulation over camera removal
Flock Safety company statement
“Rather than banning a critical public safety tool, we support thoughtful legislation and strong privacy, transparency, and accountability guardrails”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
News 6 reporting on the FDOT memo includes Flock Safety's direct response to the order. The article was updated September 1.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
News 6 asked Flock Safety to respond to FDOT's directive.
After the quotation
Flock said its technology had helped Florida agencies investigate crimes and find missing people.
How this statement is classified
Responding to: Revoking local law-enforcement permits for plate readers in Florida's state-highway rights-of-way is justified by privacy and misuse concerns.
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The company's response directly opposes the removal policy and offers regulation as an alternative.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Florida Department of Transportation
Was Florida right to remove license-plate readers from state highway rights-of-way?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full caseElectronic Frontier Foundation
“good steps forward, but we are still far from the finish line”Read statement
“I think there's still some real questions about what is going on behind the scenes”Read statement
Cocoa Beach Police Department
“This tool has helped officers within our police department to solve crimes, and its removal will make some crimes more difficult to solve.”Read statement