The National Democratic Redistricting Committee says the Supreme Court "denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt to jam through their 2025 gerrymander"

National Democratic Redistricting CommitteeNational Democratic redistricting organization, posting on its @DemRedistrict account

The National Democratic Redistricting Committee posted that the Supreme Court had "just denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt to jam through their 2025 gerrymander". It said the order reaffirms what the state's highest court said weeks earlier, that the 2025 map "was never the law", and that "Missouri Republicans tried to silence voters".

Responding to

Under the Missouri Constitution, the referendum petition kept House Bill 1 from taking effect, so the 2022 map is the only valid congressional map and must be used in the 2026 general election.

“BREAKING: SCOTUS just denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt to jam through their 2025 gerrymander! 👏 This reaffirms what the state's highest court already said weeks ago — the 2025 map was never the law. Missouri Republicans tried to silence voters. Today, they lost.”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)NDRC on X: SCOTUS denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt · National Democratic Redistricting CommitteeFull X post, published September 25, 2026 at 22:44 UTC (5:44 p.m. CDT)

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Onder v. Missouri, No. 26-2797 (8th Cir. Sept. 21, 2026) (per curiam) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOpinion pp. 3-4 (holding), pp. 33-35 (Part VI) and pp. 35-40 (Stras, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)People Not Politicians v. Onder, No. 26A388: per curiam order granting stay (September 25, 2026) · Supreme Court of the United StatesSlip opinion pp. 1-5 (per curiam), September 25, 2026

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)US Supreme Court again blocks Missouri's gerrymandered congressional map · Missouri IndependentArticle, September 25, 2026
Missouri's proposed 2025 congressional map appears beside a Supreme Court order.
Credit: Missouri House Research and Supreme Court of the United States; composite by The Dispute Index

Where this statement fits

Should Missouri be allowed to use its 2025 congressional map in the 2026 general election?

Missouri lawmakers passed a new congressional map, House Bill 1, in September 2025, and the State used it in the August 4, 2026 primary. On September 3, 2026, the Supreme Court of Missouri ruled unanimously that a referendum petition kept the map from taking effect and that the 2022 map remains in force for the November general election. Gov. Mike Kehoe, Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, Secretary of State Denny Hoskins and President Donald Trump said in early September that the primary map should be used in November, and the Eighth Circuit held on September 21 that using the 2022 map violates the U.S. Constitution. People Not Politicians, the Campaign Legal Center and the ACLU argued that Missouri law makes the 2022 map the only valid map and that ballots had been mailed under it. On September 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court, in an unsigned per curiam order that records no dissent, stayed the federal injunctions, said that under state law the 2022 map must be used, and said lower courts should not require use of the 2025 map in the 2026 election. Kehoe called that decision disappointing and said Missouri will follow the order.

Read the full case

Case updates

Missouri's map fight after the Supreme Court order

We'll email you if anyone seeks further Supreme Court review, when Missouri voters decide Proposition A, or if state officials respond to the order.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original post

NDRC on X: SCOTUS denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt (opens in a new tab) · National Democratic Redistricting CommitteeFull X post, published September 25, 2026 at 22:44 UTC (5:44 p.m. CDT)

About this source

Post from the @DemRedistrict account, which the organization's official website links, reacting to the U.S. Supreme Court's September 25 order.

Original text

Onder v. Missouri, No. 26-2797 (8th Cir. Sept. 21, 2026) (per curiam) (opens in a new tab) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOpinion pp. 3-4 (holding), pp. 33-35 (Part VI) and pp. 35-40 (Stras, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)

About this source

Published per curiam opinion affirming Chief Judge Stephen Clark's temporary restraining order and directing entry of a permanent injunction requiring the 2025 map, with the injunction administratively stayed until September 28, 2026 at 5 p.m. Central time. Judge Stras concurred in part and dissented in part, writing that he would dismiss the appeal because People Not Politicians and Richard von Glahn lack standing.

Original text

People Not Politicians v. Onder, No. 26A388: per curiam order granting stay (September 25, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United StatesSlip opinion pp. 1-5 (per curiam), September 25, 2026

About this source

Unsigned per curiam order on an application that Circuit Justice Brett Kavanaugh referred to the full Court. It stays the Eighth Circuit's September 21 mandate and September 22 order and the district court's September 21 and 22 injunctions, keeps the Court's September 10 stay in place, and says the lower courts should not prohibit use of the 2022 map or require use of the 2025 map in the 2026 congressional election in Missouri. The text of the order shows no separate opinion or noted dissent.

Reporting

US Supreme Court again blocks Missouri's gerrymandered congressional map (opens in a new tab) · Missouri IndependentArticle, September 25, 2026

About this source

Report on the Supreme Court's September 25 order, with the sequence of court actions since September 3, the filings of Missouri and the plaintiffs, and county election officials' account of absentee voting under the 2022 map.

Before the quotation

On September 21, the Eighth Circuit held that using the 2022 map in the November general election violates the Constitution. On September 25, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed that ruling and said lower courts should not require use of the 2025 map in the 2026 election.

After the quotation

The Missouri Independent reported that the 2025 map will be on the ballot as Proposition A.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. The organization welcomes the ruling that keeps the 2025 map out of the general election and describes the effort to use it as an attempt to silence voters, which condemns that use. The closest competing label, “Mixed or conditional”, loses because it attaches no condition.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: National Democratic Redistricting Committee, The National Democratic Redistricting Committee says the Supreme Court "denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt to jam through their 2025 gerrymander"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
The National Democratic Redistricting Committee says the Supreme Court "denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt to jam through their 2025 gerrymander"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/2729-the-national-democratic-redistricting-committee-posted-that-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "The National Democratic Redistricting Committee says the Supreme Court "denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt to jam through their 2025 gerrymander"". First published: 2026-09-26. Last updated: 2026-09-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/2729-the-national-democratic-redistricting-committee-posted-that-the