Attorney General Catherine Hanaway says changing the map between the primary and general elections is "profoundly unjust to Missouri voters"

Attorney General of Missouri, posting on her official @AGCHanaway account

“Missouri is prepared to follow and comply with Chief Judge Clark's order that binds the state to using the Missouri FIRST map for the November General Election. We maintain that changing the congressional map in between the primary and general elections is simply not feasible and profoundly unjust to Missouri voters.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Attorney General Catherine Hanaway on X: Missouri prepared to comply with Chief Judge Clark's order · Catherine HanawayFull X post, published 2026-09-08 22:52 UTC (5:52 p.m. CDT)
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Onder v. Missouri, No. 4:26-cv-01424-SRC, Memorandum and Order (E.D. Mo. Sept. 8, 2026)Doc. 35, pp. 1-13
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)People Not Politicians v. Onder, No. 26A388: per curiam order granting stay (September 25, 2026) · Supreme Court of the United StatesSlip opinion pp. 1-5 (per curiam), September 25, 2026
Open source (opens in a new tab)Hoskins agrees to use 2022 congressional map as Missouri Supreme Court finds him in contempt · St. Louis Public RadioArticle, published September 10, 2026 12:54 p.m. CDT and updated 8:15 p.m. CDT
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Opposition to Application for Stay, State of Missouri and Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, No. 26A388 · Catherine HanawayBrief, Introduction, pp. 1-3, filed September 23, 2026

Source and context

Original post

Attorney General Catherine Hanaway on X: Missouri prepared to comply with Chief Judge Clark's order (opens in a new tab) · Catherine HanawayFull X post, published 2026-09-08 22:52 UTC (5:52 p.m. CDT)

About this source

Post from the attorney general's official account, published the evening Chief Judge Stephen Clark issued his temporary restraining order.

Original text

Onder v. Missouri, No. 4:26-cv-01424-SRC, Memorandum and Order (E.D. Mo. Sept. 8, 2026) (opens in a new tab)Doc. 35, pp. 1-13

About this source

Temporary restraining order in the lawsuit filed by Rep. Bob Onder, Rick Brattin and two voters. It directs Missouri to use the 2025 map (House Bill 1) for the November 2026 general election. The Supreme Court stayed this order on September 10.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

People Not Politicians v. Onder, No. 26A388: per curiam order granting stay (September 25, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United StatesSlip opinion pp. 1-5 (per curiam), September 25, 2026

About this source

Unsigned per curiam order on an application that Circuit Justice Brett Kavanaugh referred to the full Court. It stays the Eighth Circuit's September 21 mandate and September 22 order and the district court's September 21 and 22 injunctions, keeps the Court's September 10 stay in place, and says the lower courts should not prohibit use of the 2022 map or require use of the 2025 map in the 2026 congressional election in Missouri. The text of the order shows no separate opinion or noted dissent.

Reporting

Hoskins agrees to use 2022 congressional map as Missouri Supreme Court finds him in contempt (opens in a new tab) · St. Louis Public RadioArticle, published September 10, 2026 12:54 p.m. CDT and updated 8:15 p.m. CDT

About this source

Report on the Supreme Court of Missouri's September 10 contempt hearing for Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, his statement directing local election authorities to use the 2022 map, and statements from Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, attorney Chuck Hatfield and Rep. Bob Onder.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Opposition to Application for Stay, State of Missouri and Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, No. 26A388 (opens in a new tab) · Catherine HanawayBrief, Introduction, pp. 1-3, filed September 23, 2026

About this source

Brief filed by the Missouri Attorney General's Office for the State of Missouri and Secretary of State Denny Hoskins. It asks the Court to deny the stay, says the State believes voting under the 2025 map better advances the public interest, and says Missouri will not be able to run an orderly general election whichever way the Court rules.

Before the quotation

Chief Judge Stephen Clark issued an order on September 8 requiring Missouri to use the 2025 map, shortly after Justice Brett Kavanaugh denied Secretary of State Denny Hoskins's application to stay the Supreme Court of Missouri's ruling.

After the quotation

On September 10, after the U.S. Supreme Court stayed Clark's order, Hanaway said her office affirmed Hoskins's direction to local election authorities to use the 2022 map. On September 23, the Missouri Attorney General's Office told the Court that the State believes voting under the 2025 map better advances the public interest.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

Case context: Should Missouri be allowed to use its 2025 congressional map in the 2026 general election?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. Hanaway argues that switching maps after the primary is unjust and infeasible, which defends using the 2025 map. The closest competing label, “Mixed or conditional”, loses because her compliance statement does not qualify that position.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Mike Kehoe

“It is disappointing that today’s decision by the United States Supreme Court means Missouri will conduct its November general election under a different congressional map than its primary election. Voters deserved consistency and certainty, and not for the rules to be changed between elections. Nevertheless, Missouri will follow the Court’s order.”
Read statement

Supreme Court of the United States

“In short, as a matter of state law, the 2022 map—not the 2025 map—must be used in the 2026 congressional election. … At this late date, ordering reversion to the 2025 map in the midst of an ongoing election would usher in electoral chaos. Purcell protects against such disorder. … And the District Court and Court of Appeals should not order or otherwise require Missouri to use the 2025 map in the 2026 congressional election in Missouri.”
Read statement

Campaign Legal Center

“Pursuant to this Court’s orders and the Missouri Supreme Court’s ruling on state law, election administration has proceeded under the 2022 map, ballots have already been mailed, and voting has begun. … This Court must once again step in to restore order by granting the Applicants’ requested relief.”
Read statement