All topics

Political Violence

Public disputes concerning politically motivated violence, threats, attacks, and claims about the causes or consequences of such violence.

Related cases

Case

Mosab Hassan Yousef’s call for Muslims to leave the United States at the Jewish American Summit

At the August 30, 2026 Jewish American Summit in Los Angeles, Mosab Hassan Yousef said he did not want Muslims in America, used profanity to tell Muslims to leave the United States, and told them to return to and reform the countries they came from. Audience members applauded. Critics characterized the remarks and the response as anti-Muslim bigotry; the dispute also concerns responsibility among the event's organizers, sponsors, speakers, and public commentators.

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Hasan Piker affirmed a hypothetical preference for Hamas over Israel through lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau disputed the moral comparison, while the ADL cited it as whitewashing terrorism. Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes and denied endorsing its domestic policies, while maintaining that Israeli occupation was the overriding concern.

Case

U.S. termination of the Hashemi–Tahmasebi family’s residency status and ICE detention

On April 11, 2026, the U.S. State Department said it had terminated the lawful permanent resident status of Seyed Eissa Hashemi, Maryam Tahmasebi, and their son, and that ICE had them in custody pending removal. Officials cited family ties and foreign-policy or national-security grounds; the family, its lawyers, and other commentators have disputed the action as family-based punishment. This case records those competing positions without deciding the legal validity of the action or the family’s current status.

More cases

Statements

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Interview subject and political livestreamer

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"Virtually all of my critics, ironically enough, have been saying the exact same thing that I’m saying."
Why we used this label

This is the subject’s own denial of the allegation and explanation of intended meaning, not independent corroboration.

Piker defiant as Democrats turn on him (opens in a new tab)Interview section addressing the August 20 remarks

Mehdi Hasan

Role at the time: Journalist and commentator

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"He has neither ‘encouraged’ nor ‘justified’ violence against American Jews. Literally zero evidence for that."
Why we used this label

The post expressly denies the central characterization advanced by Brad Sherman.

Owen Jones

Role at the time: Journalist and commentator

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording assigned American Jews responsibility for antisemitic violence directed at them.

"The argument here is that this is victim blaming—which is total nonsense."
Why we used this label

The quoted sentence directly contests the victim-blaming characterization.

Hasan Piker smeared by a panicked political establishment (opens in a new tab)Section discussing the victim-blaming interpretation

Cenk Uygur

Role at the time: Co-host, The Young Turks

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"he was saying, let’s protect Jewish Americans"
Why we used this label

He directly supplies a protective rather than threatening interpretation of the remarks.

Kyle Kulinski

Role at the time: Host, The Kyle Kulinski Show

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"What part of that was anti-Semitic? What part of that was a call for violence?"
Why we used this label

The rhetorical questions directly reject the critical characterization without necessarily endorsing every word Piker used.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate nominee in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.

"We should stop hurting people."
Why we used this label

The response maintained his causal framing after the primary rather than retracting it.

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Political commentator; CNN interview guest

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The comparison does not endorse all Hamas actions or its domestic policies.

"It's not an endorsement of their domestic policies."
Why we used this label

Disputes the implications of the comparison without withdrawing it.

CNN — Piker addresses his Hamas comparison in August 2 interview (opens in a new tab)Exchange beginning with O’Sullivan asking why Piker expresses support for Hamas; through Piker's domestic-policy answer.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Providing causal context for the attack did not justify it; the attack remained wrong, antisemitic, and unjustifiable.

"It's unserious when you want to decontextualize violence, and then say you want to stand against violence."
Why we used this label

He directly challenged critics' interpretation and maintained the explanation-versus-excuse distinction.

Van Jones

Role at the time: Commentator and author publishing a personal analysis on his own Substack

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

A lesser-evil comparison favors Hamas over Israel.

"That’s why Hamas is not a thousand times better than Israel."
Why we used this label

Jones directly disputes the comparative judgment rather than simply attacking Piker personally or denying Palestinian suffering.

Van Jones — Breakdown: Is Hasan Piker Right About Hamas? (opens in a new tab)Opening discussion of Piker's comparison and final substantive paragraph rejecting the thousand-times-better formulation.

Jon Favreau

Role at the time: Pod Save America host

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

A lesser-evil comparison favors Hamas over Israel.

"Those are different claims."
Why we used this label

An affirmative challenge to the comparative characterization, not merely an interview question or endorsement of its premises.

Pod Save America / HasanAbi — complete April 12 interview (opens in a new tab)21:21–23:20; 25:16–25:31; 29:40–30:31; 33:22–33:52. Key quotation: 22:12.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.

"It was a risk."
Why we used this label

He maintained the decision to provide causal context rather than accepting critics' characterization of the statement as excusing terrorism.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Providing causal context for the attack did not justify it; the attack remained wrong, antisemitic, and unjustifiable.

"There is never a justification. Hurt people hurt people. Violence is a cycle."
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects justification while challenging critics who treat causal explanation as moral excuse.

People with useful coverage

Ana Kasparian

Political commentator, producer, and co-host of The Young Turks, known for progressive and heterodox commentary.

2 cases and 2 statements

David Kramer

Michigan Jewish Democratic organizer.

1 case and 1 statement

Jim Clyburn

Jim Clyburn is a United States representative from South Carolina.

1 case and 1 statement

Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed is a physician, former Detroit health director, and 2026 Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan.

2 cases and 6 statements

Hasan Piker

Hasan Piker, also known as HasanAbi, is a political livestreamer and commentator.

2 cases and 3 statements

Jonathan Chait

Political columnist known for liberal commentary on American politics.

1 case and 1 statement

Dov Waxman

Dov Waxman is a professor of Israel studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, and an author on Israel, American Jewry, and antisemitism. He writes academic work and public commentary on Jewish politics and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

1 case and 1 statement

Jon Ossoff

United States senator from Georgia.

1 case and 1 statement

David Frum

David Frum is a staff writer at The Atlantic and hosts The David Frum Show.

2 cases and 2 statements

Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan is a journalist, political commentator, and founder and editor-in-chief of Zeteo.

1 case and 1 statement

Nick Fuentes

Far-right political livestreamer and host of America First.

1 case and 1 statement

More people