All topics

Political Violence

Public disputes concerning politically motivated violence, threats, attacks, and claims about the causes or consequences of such violence.

Related cases

Case

Mosab Hassan Yousef’s call for Muslims to leave the United States at the Jewish American Summit

At the August 30, 2026 Jewish American Summit in Los Angeles, Mosab Hassan Yousef said he did not want Muslims in America, used profanity to tell Muslims to leave the United States, and told them to return to and reform the countries they came from. Audience members applauded. Critics characterized the remarks and the response as anti-Muslim bigotry; the dispute also concerns responsibility among the event's organizers, sponsors, speakers, and public commentators.

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Hasan Piker affirmed a hypothetical preference for Hamas over Israel through lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau disputed the moral comparison, while the ADL cited it as whitewashing terrorism. Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes and denied endorsing its domestic policies, while maintaining that Israeli occupation was the overriding concern.

Case

U.S. termination of the Hashemi–Tahmasebi family’s residency status and ICE detention

On April 11, 2026, the U.S. State Department said it had terminated the lawful permanent resident status of Seyed Eissa Hashemi, Maryam Tahmasebi, and their son, and that ICE had them in custody pending removal. Officials cited family ties and foreign-policy or national-security grounds; the family, its lawyers, and other commentators have disputed the action as family-based punishment. This case records those competing positions without deciding the legal validity of the action or the family’s current status.

More cases

Statements

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Interview subject and political livestreamer

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"Virtually all of my critics, ironically enough, have been saying the exact same thing that I’m saying."
Why we used this label

This is the subject’s own denial of the allegation and explanation of intended meaning, not independent corroboration.

Piker defiant as Democrats turn on him (opens in a new tab)Interview section addressing the August 20 remarks

Mehdi Hasan

Role at the time: Journalist and commentator

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"He has neither ‘encouraged’ nor ‘justified’ violence against American Jews. Literally zero evidence for that."
Why we used this label

The post expressly denies the central characterization advanced by Brad Sherman.

Owen Jones

Role at the time: Journalist and commentator

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording assigned American Jews responsibility for antisemitic violence directed at them.

"The argument here is that this is victim blaming—which is total nonsense."
Why we used this label

The quoted sentence directly contests the victim-blaming characterization.

Hasan Piker smeared by a panicked political establishment (opens in a new tab)Section discussing the victim-blaming interpretation

Cenk Uygur

Role at the time: Co-host, The Young Turks

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"he was saying, let’s protect Jewish Americans"
Why we used this label

He directly supplies a protective rather than threatening interpretation of the remarks.

Kyle Kulinski

Role at the time: Host, The Kyle Kulinski Show

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"What part of that was anti-Semitic? What part of that was a call for violence?"
Why we used this label

The rhetorical questions directly reject the critical characterization without necessarily endorsing every word Piker used.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate nominee in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.

"We should stop hurting people."
Why we used this label

The response maintained his causal framing after the primary rather than retracting it.

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Political commentator; CNN interview guest

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The comparison does not endorse all Hamas actions or its domestic policies.

"It's not an endorsement of their domestic policies."
Why we used this label

Disputes the implications of the comparison without withdrawing it.

CNN — Piker addresses his Hamas comparison in August 2 interview (opens in a new tab)Exchange beginning with O’Sullivan asking why Piker expresses support for Hamas; through Piker's domestic-policy answer.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Providing causal context for the attack did not justify it; the attack remained wrong, antisemitic, and unjustifiable.

"It's unserious when you want to decontextualize violence, and then say you want to stand against violence."
Why we used this label

He directly challenged critics' interpretation and maintained the explanation-versus-excuse distinction.

Jon Favreau

Role at the time: Pod Save America host

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

A lesser-evil comparison favors Hamas over Israel.

"Those are different claims."
Why we used this label

An affirmative challenge to the comparative characterization, not merely an interview question or endorsement of its premises.

Pod Save America / HasanAbi — complete April 12 interview (opens in a new tab)21:21–23:20; 25:16–25:31; 29:40–30:31; 33:22–33:52. Key quotation: 22:12.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.

"It was a risk."
Why we used this label

He maintained the decision to provide causal context rather than accepting critics' characterization of the statement as excusing terrorism.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Providing causal context for the attack did not justify it; the attack remained wrong, antisemitic, and unjustifiable.

"There is never a justification. Hurt people hurt people. Violence is a cycle."
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects justification while challenging critics who treat causal explanation as moral excuse.

People with useful coverage

Christine Hong

Christine Hong is a professor of critical race and ethnic studies at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Her scholarship addresses race, militarism, and Asian American studies, and she participates in the UC Ethnic Studies Council.

1 case and 1 statement

Robert Reich

Robert Reich is an American author, public-policy scholar, and former United States secretary of labor. His writing and videos examine economic inequality, political power, and American government.

1 case and 1 statement

Chili Tropper

Israeli politician and member of the Knesset.

1 case and 1 statement

Yair Lapid

Israeli opposition politician and former prime minister.

1 case and 1 statement

Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin is a Democratic United States representative from Maryland and a constitutional-law scholar. He serves on the House Judiciary Committee and previously taught constitutional law.

1 case and 1 statement

Max Blumenthal

American journalist, editor of The Grayzone, and commentator on U.S. foreign policy and the Middle East.

1 case and 1 statement

Xochitl Hinojosa

Xochitl Hinojosa is a Democratic political strategist and commentator.

1 case and 1 statement

Rabbi Asher Lopatin

Asher Lopatin is a Michigan rabbi and Jewish communal leader.

1 case and 1 statement

JD Vance

JD Vance is the vice president of the United States and a former U.S. senator from Ohio. A Marine Corps veteran, he worked as a startup investor and wrote the memoir Hillbilly Elegy before his Senate election.

1 case and 1 statement

Andrew Kolvet

Andrew Kolvet is a political media host and spokesperson associated with Turning Point USA and The Charlie Kirk Show.

2 cases and 2 statements

Cenk Uygur

Progressive political commentator and co-founder and host of The Young Turks.

2 cases and 2 statements

Ana Kasparian

Political commentator, producer, and co-host of The Young Turks, known for progressive and heterodox commentary.

2 cases and 2 statements

More people