All topics

Israel

Public disputes concerning Israel, its government, institutions, policies, security, and international relations.

Related cases

Case

Macklemore’s “Free Palestine” speech on Ed Sheeran’s MetLife stage

While opening for Ed Sheeran at MetLife Stadium, Macklemore called for a free Palestine, accused Israel of apartheid and genocide, and said criticism of Israel was not criticism of Jewish people. The Israeli-American Council sought his removal, while the Anti-Defamation League and StopAntisemitism called the performance hostile, biased, or propagandistic. Macklemore published the speech in full and defended it as a demand for equal treatment. Boy George condemned the message; Paloma Faith praised it. P!nk amplified a critical post without writing a separate case-specific explanation, and Sheeran had not publicly addressed the dispute by the editorial cutoff.

Case

Mosab Hassan Yousef’s call for Muslims to leave the United States at the Jewish American Summit

At the August 30, 2026 Jewish American Summit in Los Angeles, Mosab Hassan Yousef said he did not want Muslims in America, used profanity to tell Muslims to leave the United States, and told them to return to and reform the countries they came from. Audience members applauded. Critics characterized the remarks and the response as anti-Muslim bigotry; the dispute also concerns responsibility among the event's organizers, sponsors, speakers, and public commentators.

Case

Did Mark Ruffalo’s Paramount–Warner criticism invoke antisemitic tropes?

Mark Ruffalo connected Oracle’s assistance to the Israeli military and Larry Ellison’s financing of Paramount’s proposed Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition to concerns about Gaza, surveillance, media concentration, and oligarchic power. Paramount and several Jewish organizations said his framing echoed conspiracies about Jewish wealth and media control. Ruffalo and his defenders argued that he criticized identified executives, military contracts, and a documented corporate transaction—not Jews as a group.

More cases

Statements

Max Blumenthal

Role at the time: Journalist and editor, The Grayzone

Condemned

Responding to

Yousef's remarks and the audience applause constituted anti-Muslim hate and warranted an apology and repudiation from the summit and its sponsors.

"The Israeli Shin Bet tortured Mosab to the point that he now sounds like Hitler and looks like Herzl."
Why we used this label

Despite its own provocative wording, the comparison unmistakably condemns Yousef's rhetoric.

Cenk Uygur

Role at the time: Co-host and founder of The Young Turks

Defended or excused

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"condemns the synagogue attack. Of course, any person would, there's no question, and he did, there's no question about that."
Why we used this label

He treated causal explanation as legitimate and rejected the claim that El-Sayed's context negated his condemnation.

Dov Waxman

Role at the time: Israel-studies professor, personal analysis

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"Jews are entitled to have an attachment to Israel."
Why we used this label

He agrees with the need to distinguish Jewish identity from Israel while explicitly separating his position from the safety condition he attributes to Piker.

David Frum

Role at the time: Host, The David Frum Show; staff writer

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording functioned as an implied threat against American Jews.

"That’s a pretty contemptible offer. You’ll guarantee my physical safety if I submit?"
Why we used this label

The response treats the passage as a coercive implied threat rather than a neutral warning.

Tim Pool

Role at the time: Host, Timcast IRL

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"I actually agree with the surface level sentiment. People like Hasan and his followers … were not expressing what I just expressed."
Why we used this label

He accepts the surface-level proposition while rejecting Piker’s framing or implied meaning, producing a conditional rather than binary stance.

Owen Jones

Role at the time: Journalist and commentator

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording assigned American Jews responsibility for antisemitic violence directed at them.

"The argument here is that this is victim blaming—which is total nonsense."
Why we used this label

The quoted sentence directly contests the victim-blaming characterization.

Hasan Piker smeared by a panicked political establishment (opens in a new tab)Section discussing the victim-blaming interpretation

Ben Shapiro

Role at the time: Host, The Ben Shapiro Show; columnist

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording functioned as an implied threat against American Jews.

"He also spent the weekend suggesting that Jews who support Israel are fair game."
Why we used this label

Describing people as “fair game” treats the wording as threatening or permissive toward harm.

Elissa Slotkin

Role at the time: United States senator from Michigan

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"This shouldn't be hard: no community should face the threat of violence for their political views."
Why we used this label

Slotkin rejects the attribution of responsibility to people targeted for political views.

Owen Jones

Role at the time: Political commentator

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Ruffalo criticized identified executives, a military technology relationship, and a corporate transaction rather than Jewish people as a group.

"There is nothing antisemitic about Ruffalo's opposition to the Paramount Warner Bros. merger."
Why we used this label

He explicitly rejected the characterization.

Cenk Uygur

Role at the time: Co-host, The Young Turks

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"he was saying, let’s protect Jewish Americans"
Why we used this label

He directly supplies a protective rather than threatening interpretation of the remarks.

Kyle Kulinski

Role at the time: Host, The Kyle Kulinski Show

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"What part of that was anti-Semitic? What part of that was a call for violence?"
Why we used this label

The rhetorical questions directly reject the critical characterization without necessarily endorsing every word Piker used.

Ana Kasparian

Role at the time: Co-host, The Young Turks

Defended or excused

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"the least controversial thing Hasan Piker has ever said"
Why we used this label

She affirmatively rejects the controversy’s premise and treats Piker’s underlying warning as reasonable.

Hillary Scholten

Role at the time: U.S. representative for Michigan's Third Congressional District, issuing an official statement

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"It's dangerous for everyone. […] It has no place in Michigan, and no place in our country."
Why we used this label

The official release explicitly rejects the specific remarks, characterizes them as dangerous and calls for public condemnation.

Ari Ingel

Role at the time: Executive director of Creative Community for Peace

Condemned

Responding to

Ruffalo's phrasing echoed antisemitic conspiracies about Jewish wealth, media control, and hidden power.

"Mark Ruffalo's rhetoric has increasingly crossed the line from criticism of Israel into extremist and antisemitic messaging."
Why we used this label

He explicitly classified the messaging as antisemitic.

Paramount Skydance

Role at the time: Corporate spokesperson

Condemned

Responding to

Ruffalo invoked antisemitic tropes in a dispute about a corporate transaction.

"We are, as always, troubled when antisemitic tropes are invoked in purported service of a business dispute."
Why we used this label

The statement explicitly condemns Ruffalo's rhetoric as antisemitic.

Noah Rothman

Role at the time: Senior writer at National Review

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"He agonized over whether to condemn an Islamist attack on a Michigan synagogue in which Jewish children were targets."
Why we used this label

The authored article treats El-Sayed's contextualization as a failure to distinguish terrorism from Israeli military action.

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Political commentator; CNN interview guest

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The comparison does not endorse all Hamas actions or its domestic policies.

"It's not an endorsement of their domestic policies."
Why we used this label

Disputes the implications of the comparison without withdrawing it.

CNN — Piker addresses his Hamas comparison in August 2 interview (opens in a new tab)Exchange beginning with O’Sullivan asking why Piker expresses support for Hamas; through Piker's domestic-policy answer.

Josh Gottheimer

Role at the time: U.S. Representative; co-introducer of the resolution

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

"We cannot be selective in calling out antisemitism."
Why we used this label

An official statement condemning Piker's rhetoric in a resolution that includes the comparison. The classification is not a claim that Gottheimer's quoted words addressed only this statement.

Gottheimer and Lawler introduce resolution condemning Piker’s rhetoric (opens in a new tab) - Josh GottheimerGottheimer statement; release linking the introduced resolution. The resolution cites Piker's Hamas-over-Israel comparison among other statements.

Van Jones

Role at the time: Commentator and author publishing a personal analysis on his own Substack

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

A lesser-evil comparison favors Hamas over Israel.

"That’s why Hamas is not a thousand times better than Israel."
Why we used this label

Jones directly disputes the comparative judgment rather than simply attacking Piker personally or denying Palestinian suffering.

Van Jones — Breakdown: Is Hasan Piker Right About Hamas? (opens in a new tab)Opening discussion of Piker's comparison and final substantive paragraph rejecting the thousand-times-better formulation.

Anti-Defamation League

Role at the time: Advocacy organization; institutional analysis

Condemned

Responding to

Piker's Hamas-over-Israel comparison helps whitewash Hamas's violence.

"sanitizes and justifies violence and terrorism against the State of Israel"
Why we used this label

An explicit institutional judgment tied to the comparison; not an attributed personal statement by an ADL official.

ADL — Hasan Piker: What You Need to Know (opens in a new tab) - Anti-Defamation LeagueRhetorical Themes; Support for Terror and Violence; Celebrating or whitewashing U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations.

Jon Favreau

Role at the time: Pod Save America host

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

A lesser-evil comparison favors Hamas over Israel.

"Those are different claims."
Why we used this label

An affirmative challenge to the comparative characterization, not merely an interview question or endorsement of its premises.

Pod Save America / HasanAbi — complete April 12 interview (opens in a new tab)21:21–23:20; 25:16–25:31; 29:40–30:31; 33:22–33:52. Key quotation: 22:12.

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Political commentator; interview guest

Defended or excused

Responding to

A lesser-evil comparison favors Hamas over Israel.

"I would vote for Hamas over Israel every single time."
Why we used this label

Codes his defense of the comparison, not endorsement of every Hamas action.

Pod Save America / HasanAbi — complete April 12 interview (opens in a new tab)21:21–23:20; 25:16–25:31; 29:40–30:31; 33:22–33:52. Key quotation: 22:12.

Rabbi Jen Lader

Role at the time: Rabbi, Temple Israel

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"suggesting that violence against a synagogue in suburban Detroit could be understood through the lens of Israeli actions; offensive"
Why we used this label

The criticism came from a rabbi at the attacked institution and directly opposed El-Sayed's causal framing.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Providing causal context for the attack did not justify it; the attack remained wrong, antisemitic, and unjustifiable.

"There is never a justification. Hurt people hurt people. Violence is a cycle."
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects justification while challenging critics who treat causal explanation as moral excuse.

People with useful coverage

David Frum

David Frum is a staff writer at The Atlantic and hosts The David Frum Show.

1 case and 1 statement

Owen Jones

Owen Jones is a British columnist, author, and political commentator.

2 cases and 2 statements

Tim Pool

Tim Pool is a political podcaster associated with The Tim Pool Show

1 case and 1 statement

Ben Shapiro

Conservative political commentator, author, and host of The Ben Shapiro Show.

1 case and 1 statement

Elissa Slotkin

United States senator representing Michigan.

1 case and 1 statement

Kyle Kulinski

Kyle Kulinski is a political commentator and host of The Kyle Kulinski Show.

1 case and 1 statement

Ana Kasparian

Political commentator, producer, and co-host of The Young Turks, known for progressive and heterodox commentary.

1 case and 1 statement

Hillary Scholten

Hillary Scholten is a U.S. representative for Michigan's Third Congressional District and an attorney. Before entering Congress, she worked on immigration and civil-rights matters at the U.S. Department of Justice and previously worked in social services.

1 case and 1 statement

Ari Ingel

Executive director of Creative Community for Peace.

1 case and 1 statement

Larry Ellison

Co-founder and chairman of Oracle and a financial backer of Paramount Skydance.

1 case

Mark Ruffalo

American actor, producer, and political activist known for film, television, and environmental advocacy.

1 case

David Ellison

American film producer and chairman and CEO of Paramount Skydance.

1 case

More people