All topics

2026 Midterm Elections

Public disputes concerning the 2026 U.S. midterm election cycle, including campaigns, candidates, conventions, advertising, endorsements, and election-related policy promises.

Related cases

Case

Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

At an Atlanta reelection rally, Senator Jon Ossoff said President Donald Trump did not want to do the work of the presidency and instead wanted to build a ballroom and “travel with Natalie” on a Qatari aircraft. Trump allies accused Ossoff of misogyny and of implying an affair with White House aide Natalie Harp. Ossoff did not apologize and said senior White House aides are powerful taxpayer-paid public officials whose influence is fair to scrutinize.

Case

Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?

At an August 11 Savannah campaign event, Mike Collins said the federal government has a liability when it harms someone after a pardoned January 6 defendant asked about compensation for people he said were targeted by a weaponized political system. Jon Ossoff said the answer backed taxpayer-funded payments to violent January 6 participants; the Collins campaign said it did not back automatic or blanket payouts for people prosecuted for January 6.

Case

Did Jon Ossoff’s Social Security ad fairly represent Mike Collins’s radio interview?

Jon Ossoff’s campaign ran an ad using Mike Collins’s words “get off of Social Security, get back into the workforce” to say Collins wanted to push beneficiaries off Social Security. Collins’s campaign said he misspoke and meant Medicaid; Ossoff’s campaign said the ad fairly reflected Collins’s support for pressuring beneficiaries into work. The full radio interview contains the surrounding discussion of tax cuts, Medicaid, Social Security, and work incentives.

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Hasan Piker affirmed a hypothetical preference for Hamas over Israel through lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau disputed the moral comparison, while the ADL cited it as whitewashing terrorism. Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes and denied endorsing its domestic policies, while maintaining that Israeli occupation was the overriding concern.

More cases

Statements

John Fetterman

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. senator issuing a later statement

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Fetterman said the convention appearance did not change his Democratic identity.

"We are in different parties, but we are both Team PA"
Why we used this label

An actual post-backlash rebuttal to interpretations that the appearance meant abandonment of his party.

Amber Martin

Role at the time: Pennsylvania Republican convention delegate interviewed by Newsweek

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Republicans could welcome Fetterman's cooperation without asking him to leave the Democratic Party.

"exactly what's needed in our country"
Why we used this label

Positive response qualified by acceptance of his remaining a Democrat.

Guy Ciarrocchi

Role at the time: Pennsylvania Republican convention delegate interviewed by Newsweek

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Republicans could welcome Fetterman's cooperation without asking him to leave the Democratic Party.

"the two parties find a way to work together"
Why we used this label

Supports the appearance while qualifying what Republicans should seek next.

Tré Easton

Role at the time: Former Fetterman legislative aide speaking to NBC News in his own capacity

Condemned

Responding to

Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance failed the Pennsylvanians who elected him to oppose the Trump administration.

"to see it executed at this scale is really stunning"
Why we used this label

Direct criticism of this appearance's conduct and political judgment.

Mike Johnson

Role at the time: House speaker speaking in a Fox News interview

Defended or excused

Responding to

Introducing McCormick at the Republican convention was consistent with Fetterman's stated aim of cross-party cooperation for Pennsylvania's steel industry.

"an example of common sense"
Why we used this label

Defends the senator in the context of the convention appearance and locates responsibility for the split with Democratic critics.

John Fetterman

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. senator addressing the Republican convention by recorded video

Defended or excused

Responding to

Introducing McCormick at the Republican convention was consistent with Fetterman's stated aim of cross-party cooperation for Pennsylvania's steel industry.

"we’ll work with President Trump to fight and defend the steel way of life"
Why we used this label

Records his rationale within the disputed act, not a later answer to critics.

Rabbi Aaron Starr

Role at the time: Rabbi, Congregation Shaarey Zedek

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"really only a partial apology"
Why we used this label

He explicitly regarded the apology as incomplete.

Nonnegotiable Michigan

Role at the time: Petition campaign

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

"Every constituency must occasionally remind its party that support is earned, not owed."
Why we used this label

The campaign conditions political support on stated commitments. This is one collective position, not a separate condemnation attributed to every signatory.

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: United States representative, Meet the Press interview

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

"I think all of that is an irrelevant distraction."
Why we used this label

His answer minimizes the electoral focus on Piker but contains an explicit condemnation of Hamas, so it is not a Hamas endorsement or a refusal to answer.

Mario Díaz-Balart

Role at the time: United States representative from Florida

Explicitly stayed out

Responding to

Trump and the Republican Party bear responsibility for Loomer’s rhetoric because they keep her within Trump’s political orbit.

"responder a cada persona que dice algo ofensivo realmente es algo que no me interesa hacer, nunca he hecho."
Why we used this label

His express refusal to engage supports this classification; it does not establish endorsement.

Mario Díaz-Balart interview on Laura Loomer — Esta Semana (opens in a new tab)00:53.660–01:03.300; follow-up question and response 01:30.420–02:29.940

Travis Akers

Role at the time: Political commentator, educator, and retired Navy officer speaking personally

Condemned

Responding to

Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

"deeply racist insults"
Why we used this label

He directly characterizes the disputed attacks as racist while expressing support for their target.

Mike Collins

Role at the time: Mike Collins U.S. Senate campaign, through spokesperson Sam Densmore

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Did Jon Ossoff’s Social Security ad fairly represent Mike Collins’s radio interview?

"Rep. Collins misspoke"
Why we used this label

The campaign directly contests the ad’s interpretation and says the excerpt omits crucial context.

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: United States representative

Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"Now Laura Loomer is attacking her with virulent racism."
Why we used this label

Explicit condemnation by an elected official.

Andrew Kolvet

Role at the time: Turning Point USA spokesperson and political media host

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"Michigan CANNOT afford to elect a guy like Sayed."
Why we used this label

The authored post expressly endorsed criticism centered on El-Sayed's Temple Israel response and urged electoral rejection.

Rashida Tlaib

Role at the time: United States representative

Condemned

Responding to

The absence of comparable Republican condemnation reflects a political double standard in reactions to inflammatory online figures.

"I’m going to check to see if you said anything about Laura Loomer calling a Black woman running for Senate…"
Why we used this label

The statement treats Loomer’s conduct as condemnable and principally advances a consistency argument.

Angie Nixon

Role at the time: Target of the remarks and Florida Democratic Senate nominee

Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"While Loomer throws racist tantrums, Floridians are struggling to afford groceries, housing, healthcare, and childcare."
Why we used this label

The target expressly applies the term racist to Loomer’s attacks.

JD Vance

Role at the time: Vice president of the United States

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"A person who will apologize for a murderer so long as he looks the right way."
Why we used this label

This is a strong condemnation, but Vance's wording overstates El-Sayed's literal statement, which repeatedly condemned the attack.

Mallory McMorrow

Role at the time: Michigan state senator

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"when they do something wrong"
Why we used this label

She treated the original remarks as wrong while accepting the value of the apology.

Xochitl Hinojosa

Role at the time: Democratic strategist and commentator

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"He admitted he was wrong. He apologized."
Why we used this label

She emphasized corrective action without defending the original statement.

Jim Clyburn

Role at the time: United States representative

Defended or excused

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"I take him at his word. All of us deserve second chances."
Why we used this label

He treated the apology as credible and sufficient for political support.

Jessica Alexander

Role at the time: Michigan Jewish Democratic organizer

Defended or excused

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"sincere"
Why we used this label

She accepted the apology and treated the outreach as sufficient to move forward without endorsing the original wording.

Debbie Dingell

Role at the time: United States representative from Michigan

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"I don't agree with Hasan Piker on a lot of stuff."
Why we used this label

Dingell registers disagreement with Piker but does not offer a specific characterization of the disputed passage in the cited remarks.

Older statements

People with useful coverage

Chip Roy

Chip Roy is a Republican U.S. representative for Texas's 21st Congressional District, which includes parts of the Austin and San Antonio areas and the Texas Hill Country. A lawyer and former federal prosecutor, he previously served as first assistant attorney general of Texas and chief of staff to U.S. Senator Ted Cruz.

1 case and 1 statement

Marjorie Taylor Greene

Former United States representative from Georgia and conservative political figure.

1 case and 1 statement

Marc Short

Marc Short is chairman of Advancing American Freedom and a founding partner of Advance Strategies. He previously served as chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence and White House director of legislative affairs under President Donald Trump.

1 case and 1 statement

Joan Walsh

Joan Walsh is a journalist, author, and national affairs correspondent for The Nation. Her work covers American politics and public affairs; she also writes books and produces documentary work.

1 case and 1 statement

Daniel Goldman

Daniel Goldman is a Democratic U.S. representative for New York's 10th Congressional District. A former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, he has also worked as a legal analyst and congressional investigator.

1 case and 1 statement

John Kobylt

John Kobylt is a Los Angeles talk-radio host of The John Kobylt Show on KFI AM 640. Previously a co-host of The John and Ken Show, he discusses local politics, public policy, and current events.

1 case and 1 statement

Gloria Allred

Gloria Allred is a civil-rights attorney and founding partner of Allred, Maroko & Goldberg. Her work includes employment discrimination, sexual harassment, and representation of sexual-assault victims.

1 case and 1 statement

Erica York

Erica York is a senior economist at the Tax Foundation, where she researches federal tax policy. She has also taught at Sterling College and holds a master's degree in economics from Wichita State University.

1 case and 1 statement

Matthew Boyle

Matthew Boyle is Washington bureau chief for Breitbart News, where he covers U.S. politics and conducts interviews with public officials. He joined Breitbart in 2012 after reporting for The Daily Caller.

1 case and 1 statement

Jake Shields

Jake Shields is an American former mixed martial arts fighter who competed in the UFC. He hosts Fight Back with Jake Shields, an interview podcast covering combat sports, politics, and current affairs.

1 case and 1 statement

Reem Ibrahim

Reem Ibrahim is a writer, broadcaster, and research fellow in policy and media at Reason, covering regulation, trade, and economic freedom. She previously worked at the Institute of Economic Affairs in London and is a graduate of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

1 case and 1 statement

Evan Kilgore

Evan Kilgore is an American conservative commentator and social media personality. His commentary addresses United States politics, religion, and national identity, and he describes himself publicly as an American exceptionalist.

1 case and 1 statement

More people