All topics

2026 Midterm Elections

Public disputes concerning the 2026 U.S. midterm election cycle, including campaigns, candidates, conventions, advertising, endorsements, and election-related policy promises.

Related cases

Case

Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

At an Atlanta reelection rally, Senator Jon Ossoff said President Donald Trump did not want to do the work of the presidency and instead wanted to build a ballroom and “travel with Natalie” on a Qatari aircraft. Trump allies accused Ossoff of misogyny and of implying an affair with White House aide Natalie Harp. Ossoff did not apologize and said senior White House aides are powerful taxpayer-paid public officials whose influence is fair to scrutinize.

Case

Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?

At an August 11 Savannah campaign event, Mike Collins said the federal government has a liability when it harms someone after a pardoned January 6 defendant asked about compensation for people he said were targeted by a weaponized political system. Jon Ossoff said the answer backed taxpayer-funded payments to violent January 6 participants; the Collins campaign said it did not back automatic or blanket payouts for people prosecuted for January 6.

Case

Did Jon Ossoff’s Social Security ad fairly represent Mike Collins’s radio interview?

Jon Ossoff’s campaign ran an ad using Mike Collins’s words “get off of Social Security, get back into the workforce” to say Collins wanted to push beneficiaries off Social Security. Collins’s campaign said he misspoke and meant Medicaid; Ossoff’s campaign said the ad fairly reflected Collins’s support for pressuring beneficiaries into work. The full radio interview contains the surrounding discussion of tax cuts, Medicaid, Social Security, and work incentives.

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Hasan Piker affirmed a hypothetical preference for Hamas over Israel through lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau disputed the moral comparison, while the ADL cited it as whitewashing terrorism. Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes and denied endorsing its domestic policies, while maintaining that Israeli occupation was the overriding concern.

More cases

Statements

Travis Akers

Role at the time: Political commentator, educator, and retired Navy officer speaking personally

Condemned

Responding to

Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

"deeply racist insults"
Why we used this label

He directly characterizes the disputed attacks as racist while expressing support for their target.

Mike Collins

Role at the time: Mike Collins U.S. Senate campaign, through spokesperson Sam Densmore

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Did Jon Ossoff’s Social Security ad fairly represent Mike Collins’s radio interview?

"Rep. Collins misspoke"
Why we used this label

The campaign directly contests the ad’s interpretation and says the excerpt omits crucial context.

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: United States representative

Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"Now Laura Loomer is attacking her with virulent racism."
Why we used this label

Explicit condemnation by an elected official.

Andrew Kolvet

Role at the time: Turning Point USA spokesperson and political media host

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"Michigan CANNOT afford to elect a guy like Sayed."
Why we used this label

The authored post expressly endorsed criticism centered on El-Sayed's Temple Israel response and urged electoral rejection.

Rashida Tlaib

Role at the time: United States representative

Condemned

Responding to

The absence of comparable Republican condemnation reflects a political double standard in reactions to inflammatory online figures.

"I’m going to check to see if you said anything about Laura Loomer calling a Black woman running for Senate…"
Why we used this label

The statement treats Loomer’s conduct as condemnable and principally advances a consistency argument.

Angie Nixon

Role at the time: Target of the remarks and Florida Democratic Senate nominee

Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"While Loomer throws racist tantrums, Floridians are struggling to afford groceries, housing, healthcare, and childcare."
Why we used this label

The target expressly applies the term racist to Loomer’s attacks.

JD Vance

Role at the time: Vice president of the United States

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"A person who will apologize for a murderer so long as he looks the right way."
Why we used this label

This is a strong condemnation, but Vance's wording overstates El-Sayed's literal statement, which repeatedly condemned the attack.

Mallory McMorrow

Role at the time: Michigan state senator

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"when they do something wrong"
Why we used this label

She treated the original remarks as wrong while accepting the value of the apology.

Xochitl Hinojosa

Role at the time: Democratic strategist and commentator

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"He admitted he was wrong. He apologized."
Why we used this label

She emphasized corrective action without defending the original statement.

Jim Clyburn

Role at the time: United States representative

Defended or excused

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"I take him at his word. All of us deserve second chances."
Why we used this label

He treated the apology as credible and sufficient for political support.

Jessica Alexander

Role at the time: Michigan Jewish Democratic organizer

Defended or excused

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"sincere"
Why we used this label

She accepted the apology and treated the outreach as sufficient to move forward without endorsing the original wording.

Debbie Dingell

Role at the time: United States representative from Michigan

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"I don't agree with Hasan Piker on a lot of stuff."
Why we used this label

Dingell registers disagreement with Piker but does not offer a specific characterization of the disputed passage in the cited remarks.

Dana Nessel

Role at the time: Michigan attorney general

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"making excuses for an attempted mass killing of children"
Why we used this label

This is direct Democratic criticism grounded in the impact of the framing on the targeted community.

Glenn Greenwald

Role at the time: Journalist and host

Minimized

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"they seem to be reserving their greatest venom and the bulk of their energy attacking Hasan Piker, who isn’t on the ballot"
Why we used this label

The statement minimizes the controversy’s electoral relevance without clearly endorsing Piker’s exact wording.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate and former Wayne County health director

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"Antisemitism is a scourge, and we need to address it in all its forms."
Why we used this label

El-Sayed condemns antisemitism and rejects rhetoric that endangers the Jewish community.

Wanda Townes

Role at the time: Georgia Democratic county party chair

Defended or excused

Responding to

Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

"That softness is the reason Trump is in office. Stop being soft."
Why we used this label

Affirmative defense of the tactic rather than a literal claim about an affair.

Aaron Parnas

Role at the time: Attorney and political commentator

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Jon Ossoff’s “travel with Natalie” remark insinuated that Donald Trump and Natalie Harp were having an affair.

"All Jon Ossoff said was that Donald Trump wants to fly with Natalie."
Why we used this label

Direct challenge to the characterization that the statement itself alleged an affair.

David Axelrod

Role at the time: Democratic political strategist

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Ossoff’s remark was sexist and misogynistic because it reduced a female White House aide’s professional role to a sexual implication.

"I thought that the attack was tough, fair, pointed. I thought the ‘with Natalie’ part was gratuitous and unnecessary and distracted and detracted from the attack."
Why we used this label

Expressly splits approval of the political argument from disapproval of the personal phrasing.

Jon Ossoff

Role at the time: United States senator and reelection candidate

Condemned

Responding to

Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

"He doesn’t want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar."
Why we used this label

Ossoffs statement directly criticizes Trump conduct and the reported travel arrangement.

Scandal piñata — Jon Ossoff Atlanta rally transcript (opens in a new tab)Paragraph beginning “He doesn’t want to do the job”

Mike Collins

Role at the time: Mike Collins U.S. Senate campaign, through spokesperson Meyer Siegfried

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?

"“Mike Collins fully supports holding the government accountable when federal agencies abuse their power and believes Americans who’ve been wronged by their government ought to have a path to seek justice. He does not support a blank-check fund or automatic taxpayer-funded payouts to anyone simply because they were prosecuted for January 6.”"
Why we used this label

The campaign expressly disputes Ossoff’s characterization of Collins’s answer as support for taxpayer-funded payouts to January 6 defendants.

Jon Ossoff

Role at the time: United States senator from Georgia and Democratic candidate for reelection

Condemned

Responding to

Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?

"“Congressman Collins needs to immediately come out and publicly retract his support for these taxpayer-funded payouts to violent insurrectionists.”"
Why we used this label

Ossoff directly characterizes Collins’s answer as endorsement of payments to violent insurrectionists and calls it unacceptable.

Ossoff campaign calls on Collins to retract January 6 compensation support (opens in a new tab)August 12, 2026 press release and linked virtual press conference
Older statements

People with useful coverage

Tré Easton

Vice president for public affairs at the Searchlight Institute.

1 case and 1 statement

Dave McCormick

Republican U.S. senator representing Pennsylvania.

1 case

Mike Johnson

U.S. House speaker and representative of Louisiana's 4th congressional district

1 case and 1 statement

John Fetterman

Democratic U.S. senator representing Pennsylvania.

1 case and 2 statements

Donald Trump

Donald Trump is the 45th and 47th president of the United States. Before entering national politics, he worked in real estate development and entertainment.

3 cases and 1 statement

JD Vance

JD Vance is the vice president of the United States and a former U.S. senator from Ohio. A Marine Corps veteran, he worked as a startup investor and wrote the memoir Hillbilly Elegy before his Senate election.

2 cases and 2 statements

Rabbi Aaron Starr

Rabbi at Congregation Shaarey Zedek in Southfield, Michigan, and president of the Michigan Board of Rabbis.

1 case and 1 statement

Rabbi Josh Whinston

Rabbi leading Temple Beth Emeth in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

1 case and 1 statement

Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin is a Democratic United States representative from Maryland and a constitutional-law scholar. He serves on the House Judiciary Committee and previously taught constitutional law.

1 case and 1 statement

Mario Díaz-Balart

Republican member of the United States House of Representatives from Florida.

1 case and 1 statement

Travis Akers

Travis Akers is an American educator, retired U.S. Navy intelligence officer, and advocate for military families. Based in Jacksonville, Florida, he writes and speaks about veterans' affairs, public education, gun safety, and politics.

1 case and 1 statement

Mike Collins

Mike Collins is a Republican U.S. representative from Georgia's 10th Congressional District and the Republican nominee for the 2026 United States Senate election in Georgia.

2 cases and 3 statements

More people