Scott Mechkowski

Scott Mechkowski is a retired U.S. immigration enforcement official who served more than 24 years in federal immigration enforcement, retiring as deputy field office director for ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations in New York City. He is a visiting fellow for deportation studies at the Oversight Project and writes and comments on immigration enforcement.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Scott Mechkowski on Government Transparency, Immigration Policy, and Law Enforcement. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Scott Mechkowski

Scott Mechkowski

Role at the time: Retired deputy field office director for ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations in New York City, in a Daily Wire opinion column

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

In a Daily Wire column, Scott Mechkowski, a retired ICE deputy field office director in New York, wrote that a vehicle driven at an officer is a deadly weapon and that the case turns on whether the man was using his car as a weapon, which he said the footage will show. He criticized officials who condemned the shooting before any video was public.

“A vehicle driven at an officer is a deadly weapon, and I taught officers to treat it that way. ... DHS hasn’t yet said what that officer saw in that moment. That question decides this case: was the man behind the wheel using his car as a weapon against an officer? The footage will answer it.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)The Politics Behind Public Safety's Most Dangerous Narratives (Scott Mechkowski, The Daily Wire)Paragraph beginning 'Here is what the crowd demanding abolition skipped.'
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether the ICE officer was justified in shooting the man in the car. Mechkowski says "That question decides this case" and frames it as whether the driver was "using his car as a weapon against an officer", which makes his view of the shooting depend on footage not yet released, so we labeled it Mixed or conditional. The closest competing label is Defended or excused, since he argues a car driven at an officer is a deadly weapon and faults officials who condemned the shooting early; it loses because he does not say the condition was met.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.