Sahar Razavi

Sahar Razavi is an associate professor of political science at California State University, Sacramento, and director of its Iranian and Middle Eastern Studies Center. Her research examines Iranian politics and the Iranian diaspora. She earned her bachelor's degree at California State University San Marcos and her master's degree and doctorate at Northern Arizona University.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Sahar Razavi, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Is it a war? Follow the dispute over Vance's Iran remark

Get an email if the Senate acts on H. Con. Res. 93, if the administration describes the fighting differently, or when lawmakers and officials respond to Vance.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Sahar Razavi

Sahar Razavi

Role at the time: Associate professor of political science and director of the Iranian and Middle Eastern Studies Center, California State University, Sacramento

Condemned

Statement summary

Sahar Razavi, asked on CNN what she made of Vice President Vance's claim that he would not call the conflict a war, said everybody knows it is a war. She said some of Vance's remark was political posturing, and called it bluster.

“I think everybody knows that it's a war. ... So, I think some of it is political posturing and some of it is perhaps trying to sell this as less of a war than it actually is. ... It's more just bluster, I believe, from J.D. Vance.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Sahar Razavi responds to Vance on the Iran conflict · CNNCNN Newsroom, September 4, 2026, 2-3 a.m. ET; Razavi interview between the 02:15 and 02:20 markers.
Why we used this label

The case's reference point is Vice President Vance's September 3 statement that he would not call the fighting with Iran a war. Razavi said everybody knows it is a war, said some of Vance's remark was political posturing, and called it bluster. We record this as Condemned because she rejects the claim and criticizes the motive behind it. Challenged the characterization is the closest competing label; it loses because she goes beyond disputing the word and criticizes Vance's statement itself.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage