Sabrina Sebaihi

Portrait of Sabrina Sebaihi
TrisHR via Wikimedia Commons

French politician and member of the National Assembly for the 4th constituency of Hauts-de-Seine. She sits with the Écologiste et Social group and serves as a secretary of the National Assembly.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Sabrina Sebaihi, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

France's police firearms presumption: follow it in the Senate

Get notified if the Senate debates or votes on the bill, if the government changes the text, or when officials, police unions and rights groups respond.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Sabrina Sebaihi

Portrait of Sabrina Sebaihi

Sabrina Sebaihi

Role at the time: Member and secretary of the National Assembly, Écologiste et Social group

Condemned

Statement summary

Sebaihi opposed the proposal, saying it reverses the burden of proof and protects neither professional police officers nor the people they serve.

“This bill protects neither police officers, who carry out their mission with professionalism and whose daily work I salute ... nor our fellow citizens whom they are supposed to protect. It creates a presumption of self-defense that reverses the burden of proof, the foundation of our judicial system. (Translated from French. Original: Cette proposition de loi ne protège ni les policiers, qui accomplissent leur mission avec professionnalisme et dont je salue le travail au quotidien ... ni nos concitoyens qu'ils sont censés protéger. Elle crée une présomption de légitime défense qui inverse la charge de la preuve, fondement de notre système judiciaire.)”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Sabrina Sebaihi question on Bill 691, July 7, 2026Question au Gouvernement no. 1764
Why we used this label

She expressly described the proposal as dangerous, said it would reinforce impunity and called for its withdrawal. That is explicit condemnation of the conduct at issue.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage