Robin Wonsley

Portrait of Robin Wonsley
Taylor DahlinSourceCC BY 2.0Image converted to PNG and resized proportionally. Uses the existing Commons portrait crop.

Robin Wonsley is a member of the Minneapolis City Council for Ward 2, in the eastern part of the city, which includes the Longfellow, Cooper, Seward, Riverside, University, Augsburg, Prospect Park and Como neighborhoods. She was first elected in 2021 and describes herself on the city's website as a Democratic Socialist.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Robin Wonsley on Artificial Intelligence, Labor Policy, and Law Enforcement, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Robin Wonsley

Portrait of Robin Wonsley

Robin Wonsley

Role at the time: Minneapolis city council member

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Wonsley votes for the ordinance requiring human safety monitors inside commercial robotaxis.

“Action: Voted aye on the Minneapolis autonomous-vehicle ordinance requiring human safety monitors.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Minneapolis official autonomous-vehicle legislative history and votesFile 2026-00738; October 1 and October 15 roll calls
Why we used this label

The case concerns requiring human monitors inside commercial robotaxis. Wonsley supports that requirement through her recorded aye vote.

Portrait of Robin Wonsley

Robin Wonsley

Role at the time: Member of the Minneapolis City Council for Ward 2

Condemned

Statement summary

In her September 25, 2026 Ward 2 newsletter, Minneapolis Council Member Robin Wonsley wrote that she worked with Council Members Chavez, Stevenson and Osman on a resolution calling on the University of Minnesota and the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office to remove all Flock cameras across the city. She wrote that the cameras are part of a growing trend of excessive surveillance and that the committee approved the resolution with her voting in support.

“These cameras are part of a growing trend of excessive surveillance and technofascism. ... I worked with Council Members Chavez, Stevenson and Vice President Osman on a resolution calling on the University of Minnesota and Hennepin County Sheriff's Office to remove all Flock cameras across the city.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Ward 2 UpdatesWard 2 Updates newsletter dated September 25, 2026, item headed Opposing Flock cameras from UMPD and County Sheriff, Background and Key votes paragraphs
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Wonsley co-wrote a council resolution calling on the university and the county sheriff to remove all Flock cameras, voted for it in committee, and calls the cameras part of a trend of excessive surveillance. That is a call to end the cameras outright, so we labeled it Condemned and placed it at Ban on the remedy ladder. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, which would fit a call for limits or a pause; the newsletter asks for removal.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.