Nav Gurm

Nav Gurm is a Fresno attorney who founded the small business Five River Strategies in 2021. He previously worked at Fresno City Hall and works for a statewide nonprofit. He is a candidate for Fresno City Council District 7 in 2026.

Candidate for local office in Fresno, California (2026)Website (opens in a new tab)

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Nav Gurm, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Nav Gurm

Nav Gurm

Role at the time: Candidate for Fresno City Council, District 7

Condemned

Statement summary

Nav Gurm, a candidate for Fresno City Council District 7, said the city should not renew its Flock camera contract and cited Fourth Amendment concerns about a citywide license-plate network.

“The city should not renew the Flock cameras contract I have serious Fourth Amendment concerns with a privately operated, citywide license-plate network that tracks everyday movement. Public safety tools must include warrants, independent audits, short retention periods, and no mission creep.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Fact check: Where do Fresno City Council D7 candidates stand on Flock cameras?Sections headed "Nav Gurm on flock cameras" and "Ariana Martinez-Lott on flock cameras"
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Gurm says Fresno should not renew its Flock contract and objects to a privately operated citywide plate network. Refusing to keep the city's cameras is Condemned on this tracker; his list of requirements for public safety tools does not make his opposition to renewal conditional.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage