Naaja H. Nathanielsen

Portrait of Naaja H. Nathanielsen
European Union, 2023 / EC, Photo: Xavier LejeuneSourceCC BY 4.0Existing portrait crop retained.

Greenlandic politician of Inuit Ataqatigiit who was elected to the Danish Folketing for Greenland on March 24, 2026, after serving in the Greenland government (Naalakkersuisut). She chairs the Folketing's Greenland Committee.

What we have documented

We have documented 2 statements by Naaja H. Nathanielsen, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Next steps for the Greenland deal Trump called 'permanent control'

Get an email if Denmark's and Greenland's parliaments act on the agreement, or if officials dispute or repeat Trump's 'permanent control' description.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Naaja H. Nathanielsen

Portrait of Naaja H. Nathanielsen

Naaja H. Nathanielsen

Role at the time: Member of the Danish Folketing for Greenland (Inuit Ataqatigiit), in an interview with The Associated Press

Minimized

Statement summary

In an interview with The Associated Press on October 14, 2026, Folketing member Naaja H. Nathanielsen said Trump calling the island our Greenland was somewhat disrespectful, that it could be read as a term of endearment by someone very generous, and that she did not think much of it. She also told AP that current resource projects were years from potential success.

“I think, of course, it's somewhat disrespectful ... But you can also see it as a term of endearment if you wanted to be very generous. Right now, I don't think much of it.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Trump says oil, gas and mineral exploration in Greenland is set to begin. It's not that simple · Associated PressParagraphs quoting Naaja H. Nathanielsen
Why we used this label

The reference point is Trump's description of the agreement as giving the United States permanent control over security and all other needs in Greenland, which his October 14 post extends by calling the island our new and beautiful Greenland. Nathanielsen calls that wording somewhat disrespectful but says it could be read generously and that she does not think much of it, which acknowledges the objection while downplaying its importance. The closest competing label is condemns, because she calls the phrase disrespectful. That loses because she qualifies the criticism at once and says the wording does not concern her.

Portrait of Naaja H. Nathanielsen

Naaja H. Nathanielsen

Role at the time: Member of the Danish Folketing for Inuit Ataqatigiit (Greenland) and chair of the Folketing's Greenland Committee, on her Facebook politician page

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

In a Facebook post on the evening of September 18, 2026, written in Greenlandic and Danish, Folketing member Naaja H. Nathanielsen called the agreement news that people in Greenland had hoped would come, said any agreement must uphold Greenland's right to self-determination, and said she is cheering for the Greenland government (Naalakkersuisut) to get the agreement over the finish line. She shared a post by Greenland's foreign minister, Múte B. Egede, which Sermitsiaq describes as saying an agreement was within reach. The quotation is an English translation of the Danish text of the post.

“News we have all hoped would come. It is crucially important that any agreement upholds our right to self-determination. Cheering for Naalakkersuisut to get the agreement over the finish line”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Naaja H. Nathanielsen, Inuit Ataqatigiit, Facebook post: '(Dansk længere nede) ... En nyhed vi alle har håbet på ville komme' · Naaja H. NathanielsenDanish text after the '//' divider, sentences 1-3. Posted Friday, September 18, 2026, 6:44 PM EDT (page data creation_time 2026-09-18T22:44:06Z).
Why we used this label

Nathanielsen does not address that wording; she welcomes the news and says she is cheering for the Greenland government to conclude an agreement, while making her support depend on the express condition that any agreement upholds Greenland's right to self-determination. The closest competing label is “Defended or excused”, because she cheers on the agreement. That loses because what she backs is the Greenland government reaching an agreement that preserves self-determination, not the deal as Trump and Rubio describe it.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage