In a press release issued jointly with Greenland's government, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said she was glad that Greenland, Denmark and the United States were about to make an agreement that strengthens common security in the Arctic and the North Atlantic. She said it also recognizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom and the Greenlandic people's right to self-determination; the release does not mention Trump's description of the agreement and says entry into force is subject to national parliamentary procedures. The quotation is from the official English version of the release; the Danish original says 'a good agreement' (god aftale) where the English says 'a great agreement'.
Why we used this label
The case's fixed reference point is Trump's description of the not-yet-signed agreement as giving the United States permanent control over security and all other needs in Greenland. Frederiksen welcomes the expected agreement as great for the three parties, NATO and Europe while stating that it at the same time recognizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom and the Greenlandic people's right to self-determination, and the joint release she is quoted in makes entry into force subject to national parliamentary procedures; she neither mentions nor disputes Trump's description. The closest competing label is defends_or_excuses, because she calls the agreement great. That loses because she does not affirm the description Trump gives of it, and her welcome is paired with the sovereignty and self-determination clause and the release's parliamentary condition, so it is not a clean endorsement of the deal as Trump and Rubio describe it.