Matthew Silverman

Matthew Silverman is national president of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, a professional association for federal officers and agents. Elected president in 2023 after serving as national vice president, he was employed by the U.S. Marshals Service at the time of the election.

Also known as Mathew SilvermanWebsite (opens in a new tab)

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Matthew Silverman, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Updates on the Garces Perez shooting and assault charge

We'll email you if the assault case against Garces Perez moves forward, if footage of the shooting is released, or if investigators report on why the officer fired.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Matthew Silverman

Matthew Silverman

Role at the time: National President of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, writing in an editorial

Explicitly stayed out

Statement summary

Matthew Silverman, National President of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, wrote in a Law Enforcement Today editorial that the Austin case should not be decided through social media, political rhetoric or incomplete reporting. He said investigators should determine what happened and that the truth should emerge before judgment is rendered.

“We should not decide the Austin case through social media, political rhetoric, or incomplete reporting. We should allow investigators to determine what happened, release the facts as legally appropriate, and hold everyone involved to the same standard. The public deserves transparency. The injured individual deserves due process. The officer deserves a fair and impartial investigation. Most importantly, the truth deserves the opportunity to emerge before judgment is rendered.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)The Austin ICE Shooting Demands Facts, Not Instant JudgmentsThe last two paragraphs of the editorial, beginning 'We should not decide the Austin case through social media'
Why we used this label

The case asks whether ICE's use of force in the shooting of Wilber Rafael Garces Perez was justified. Silverman does not say the shot was justified or unjustified. He writes that the Austin case should not be decided before investigators establish what happened and that judgment should wait for the facts. We used the Explicitly stayed out label because he chose to withhold judgment on the shooting itself.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage