FLEOA president Silverman says judgment on the Austin ICE shooting should wait for investigators

Matthew SilvermanNational President of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, writing in an editorial

Explicitly stayed out

Matthew Silverman, National President of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, wrote in a Law Enforcement Today editorial that the Austin case should not be decided through social media, political rhetoric or incomplete reporting. He said investigators should determine what happened and that the truth should emerge before judgment is rendered.

“We should not decide the Austin case through social media, political rhetoric, or incomplete reporting. We should allow investigators to determine what happened, release the facts as legally appropriate, and hold everyone involved to the same standard. The public deserves transparency. The injured individual deserves due process. The officer deserves a fair and impartial investigation. Most importantly, the truth deserves the opportunity to emerge before judgment is rendered.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)The Austin ICE Shooting Demands Facts, Not Instant JudgmentsThe last two paragraphs of the editorial, beginning 'We should not decide the Austin case through social media'

Case updates

Updates on the Garces Perez shooting and assault charge

We'll email you if the assault case against Garces Perez moves forward, if footage of the shooting is released, or if investigators report on why the officer fired.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Reporters and advocates gather at the Austin press conference where Wilber Rafael Garces Perez spoke by phone from ICE detention.
Credit: Leila Saidane for The Texas Tribune

Where this statement fits

Should ICE's use of force in the shooting of Wilber Rafael Garces Perez be condemned or condoned?

On September 20, 2026, an ICE officer shot and wounded Wilber Rafael Garces Perez, a 28-year-old Venezuelan national working as a DoorDash driver, during an immigration enforcement operation in North Austin, Texas. He was taken to Dell Seton Medical Center in serious but stable condition and later transferred into ICE custody. Garces Perez says an unmarked SUV struck his vehicle before he realized the people pursuing him were immigration officers, that he asked an agent if he could stop somewhere safer than under a freeway overpass, and that he was shot after the agent refused. On September 29, federal prosecutors charged him with assaulting and resisting a federal officer. In a sworn affidavit, they say he refused commands to get out of his car and drove off, hitting an officer with his side mirror, and that after a brief chase one officer says Garces Perez tried to hit him with the car, and the officer fired. DHS has confirmed the shooting and said Garces Perez was subject to a final removal order. The dispute is whether the use of force against him was justified.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

The Austin ICE Shooting Demands Facts, Not Instant Judgments (opens in a new tab)The last two paragraphs of the editorial, beginning 'We should not decide the Austin case through social media'

About this source

First-person editorial by the National President of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, published on Law Enforcement Today on September 24, 2026. The site notes that opinions in the piece are not necessarily its own.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

On September 20, 2026, an officer-involved shooting occurred during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation in Austin. Silverman wrote that public officials, commentators and news outlets began reporting on it almost immediately, with some assigning blame before many essential facts were known, and that news organizations had asked him to comment as FLEOA's national president.

After the quotation

In the same piece Silverman wrote that individual officers should be judged on the facts of their own conduct and not condemned merely for performing duties lawfully assigned to them. He also wrote that everyone should want a thorough, transparent and impartial investigation, and that supporting law enforcement and demanding accountability are not competing principles.

How this statement is classified

Explicitly stayed out

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case asks whether ICE's use of force in the shooting of Wilber Rafael Garces Perez was justified. Silverman does not say the shot was justified or unjustified. He writes that the Austin case should not be decided before investigators establish what happened and that judgment should wait for the facts. We used the Explicitly stayed out label because he chose to withhold judgment on the shooting itself.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Matthew Silverman, FLEOA president Silverman says judgment on the Austin ICE shooting should wait for investigatorsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
FLEOA president Silverman says judgment on the Austin ICE shooting should wait for investigators
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3437-matthew-silverman-national-president-of-the-federal-law

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "FLEOA president Silverman says judgment on the Austin ICE shooting should wait for investigators". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3437-matthew-silverman-national-president-of-the-federal-law