Matt Steinglass

Matt Steinglass is Europe editor of The Economist. He has reported from the Netherlands, West Africa and Vietnam and previously worked as a Financial Times correspondent and a television screenwriter. He began writing for The Economist in 2009. He studied Russian history and literature at Harvard and interactive telecommunications at New York University, and wrote episodes of the children's television series Arthur. Before journalism, he worked as a website producer for startup companies and wrote animated television for Disney and Nickelodeon.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Matt Steinglass on Artificial Intelligence, Criminal Justice Policy, and Government Transparency, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Matt Steinglass

Matt Steinglass

Role at the time: Europe editor of The Economist, commenting personally

Condemned

Statement summary

Steinglass condemns the planned broadcast by comparing the government's methods and values with those of the Islamic State.

“America’s government surrenders to the Islamic State by embracing its methods and values”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Matt Steinglass criticizes the planned Hasan execution broadcast · Matt SteinglassComplete post quoting the Associated Press
Why we used this label

His comparison expressly criticizes the public broadcast.

Matt Steinglass

Role at the time: Europe editor of The Economist, commenting personally

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Steinglass defends the rule because deliberately abusive interactions could teach habits people repeat toward humans and animals.

“Actually think this is a good idea. Seems clear what sort of behavior they mean”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Matt Steinglass defends Anthropic's model-abuse rule · Matt SteinglassReply to Bergstrom; subsequent explanation about a programmer
Why we used this label

He expressly supports the model-abuse restriction and offers a reason independent of whether Claude can feel pain.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.