Martin Looney

Portrait of Martin Looney
Liam EneaSourceCC BY-SA 2.0Existing portrait crop retained; resized only. Image reused under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Martin M. Looney is a Democratic member of the Connecticut State Senate representing New Haven and Hamden. He is the Senate's President Pro Tempore.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Martin Looney, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Interested in what Connecticut's review of the Meriden arrest finds?

Get an email if the Judicial Branch or state police finish their reviews, or if ICE or Connecticut officials say more about the courthouse arrest.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Martin Looney

Portrait of Martin Looney

Martin Looney

Role at the time: Connecticut Senate President Pro Tempore

Condemned

Statement summary

Senate President Pro Tempore Martin Looney said ICE's use of masks reflected a lack of confidence in its own mission, contrasting it with the FBI, ATF and federal court marshals, none of which he said wear masks.

“The agency operating ICE inherently understands that some of what they’re doing is shameful, and that’s why they don’t want to be identified. It’s an extraordinary thing for people engaged in law enforcement to think they have to remain anonymous. It means that they don’t have confidence in the morality of their own mission. FBI agents do not wear masks. ATF agents — they don’t wear masks, either. Federal marshals who protect courthouses — they don’t wear masks.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)CT law limits federal ICE agents. Debate is over whether it can it be enforced or needs to changeQuotes from Ritter, Tong, Vaulman (for Governor Lamont), the Hands Off Connecticut coalition, Looney and the Judicial Branch spokeswoman
Why we used this label

Looney criticizes ICE's masking practice as shameful and inconsistent with other federal law enforcement, an express criticism of that conduct.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage