Looney says FBI and ATF agents "do not wear masks"

Martin LooneyConnecticut Senate President Pro Tempore

Condemned

Senate President Pro Tempore Martin Looney said ICE's use of masks reflected a lack of confidence in its own mission, contrasting it with the FBI, ATF and federal court marshals, none of which he said wear masks.

“The agency operating ICE inherently understands that some of what they’re doing is shameful, and that’s why they don’t want to be identified. It’s an extraordinary thing for people engaged in law enforcement to think they have to remain anonymous. It means that they don’t have confidence in the morality of their own mission. FBI agents do not wear masks. ATF agents — they don’t wear masks, either. Federal marshals who protect courthouses — they don’t wear masks.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)CT law limits federal ICE agents. Debate is over whether it can it be enforced or needs to changeQuotes from Ritter, Tong, Vaulman (for Governor Lamont), the Hands Off Connecticut coalition, Looney and the Judicial Branch spokeswoman

Case updates

Interested in what Connecticut's review of the Meriden arrest finds?

Get an email if the Judicial Branch or state police finish their reviews, or if ICE or Connecticut officials say more about the courthouse arrest.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

ICE agents walk outside the Meriden courthouse as bystanders film them.
Credit: Laura Tillman/CT Mirror

Where this statement fits

Did ICE's conduct at the Meriden, Connecticut, courthouse violate the state's TRUST Act?

On September 23, 2026, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, some wearing face coverings, entered a courthouse in Meriden, Connecticut, and took Welington Leonel Almara-Diaz into custody. Activists confronted the agents outside the courthouse entrance, asking why they were violating the state's TRUST Act, which limits immigration enforcement at Connecticut courthouses; sources disagree on whether the law's separate ban on masked law enforcement was already in effect that day. Judicial marshals moved activists away from the entrance; one woman was pepper-sprayed and another fell and was taken to a hospital by ambulance, though sources also disagree on who pushed her. The Connecticut Judicial Branch confirmed marshals had received a warrant of removal or deportation before the arrest and said it was reviewing whether state law was followed. ICE said the arrest was appropriate because Almara-Diaz had a 2023 removal order, and said judicial marshals impeded the arrest; the Judicial Branch later said its review did not support that. State officials, including Attorney General William Tong and Governor Ned Lamont's office, said ICE's conduct at the courthouse was improper. The dispute is whether ICE's conduct at the courthouse, including its use of face coverings and how the operation and marshals' cooperation with it were carried out, complied with the TRUST Act.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

CT law limits federal ICE agents. Debate is over whether it can it be enforced or needs to change (opens in a new tab)Quotes from Ritter, Tong, Vaulman (for Governor Lamont), the Hands Off Connecticut coalition, Looney and the Judicial Branch spokeswoman

About this source

Reports on-record reactions from state legislative leaders, the Attorney General, the Governor's office, an immigrant-advocacy coalition and the Judicial Branch as the TRUST Act's October 1 protected-spaces provision approached.

Before the quotation

Looney said he believes the TRUST Act is constitutional and that ICE officials are ignoring a presumptively valid state law.

After the quotation

Looney said he would be open to a special legislative session later in the year if a federal court ruling required it.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Looney criticizes ICE's masking practice as shameful and inconsistent with other federal law enforcement, an express criticism of that conduct.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

More from this case

Read the full case

Hands Off Connecticut calls the marshals' cooperation with ICE "an unforgivable act of collaboration"

Hands Off Connecticut

“When federal agents barged into the state courthouse in Meriden, they did not just abduct another community member, they fundamentally challenged the legitimacy of our state government. Marshals opened the doors wide for ICE while pushing the citizens out of their own courthouse. ICE went so far as to pepper spray bystanders and a marshal assaulted another, causing one to be taken from the court by ambulance to the ER. This is an unforgivable act of collaboration, for which we demand justice.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Martin Looney, Looney says FBI and ATF agents "do not wear masks"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Looney says FBI and ATF agents "do not wear masks"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3276-senate-president-pro-tempore-martin-looney-said-ice

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Looney says FBI and ATF agents "do not wear masks"". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3276-senate-president-pro-tempore-martin-looney-said-ice