Manuel Bompard

Portrait of Manuel Bompard
SachaLintignat via Wikimedia Commons

French politician and member of the National Assembly for the 4th constituency of Bouches-du-Rhône. He sits with La France insoumise–Nouveau Front Populaire.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Manuel Bompard, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

France's police firearms presumption: follow it in the Senate

Get notified if the Senate debates or votes on the bill, if the government changes the text, or when officials, police unions and rights groups respond.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Manuel Bompard

Portrait of Manuel Bompard

Manuel Bompard

Role at the time: Member of the National Assembly, La France insoumise–Nouveau Front Populaire group

Condemned

Statement summary

Bompard opposed the proposal, arguing that it would shift the evidentiary burden to victims and prevent an automatic investigation after a death caused by police gunfire.

“It will no longer be up to the person who fired to prove that they acted in self-defense, but up to the victim to prove that the shot did not comply with the law. France would then become a country where a death by police gunfire would not trigger any automatic investigation. (Translated from French. Original: Ce ne sera plus à l’auteur du tir d’apporter la preuve qu’il a agi en état de légitime défense, mais à la victime de prouver que ce tir n’était pas conforme à la loi. La France deviendrait dès lors un pays où une mort par tir policier ne donnerait lieu à aucune enquête automatique.)”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Manuel Bompard question on Bill 691, July 7, 2026Question au Gouvernement no. 1753
Why we used this label

He argued that the proposal would suppress oversight and produce impunity, then called for its withdrawal. That is explicit condemnation of the conduct at issue.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage