Liliana Peinder
Role at the time: Candidate for Huntsville City Council, District 3
Condemned
Statement summary
Liliana Peinder said Huntsville does not need the Flock system, called it an invasion of privacy that goes against the Fourth Amendment, and said she is very anti-Flock.
“And yes, I hear, you know, that it’s a tool, but we also have a lot of other tools that we use in investigation. And an example of that is the drones that the Police Department uses. And so I don’t think that we need the system. We already have people in place. And to me, it is an invasion of privacy and, you know, it goes against our Fourth Amendment. So my stance on that is I’m very anti-Flock.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Robinson, Peinder talk growth, Flock cameras and priorities ahead of District 3 runoffQuestion on Flock: 'What should the city do with the system'
Why we used this label
The reference point is whether networked license-plate cameras such as Flock should exist and be used. Peinder says the city does not need the system, calls it an invasion of privacy and describes herself as very anti-Flock, and she said she would vote against the contract in January. That is opposition to the system itself, so Condemned fits.