John Duran

Portrait of John Duran
FosseTheCatSourcePublic domainExisting portrait crop retained.

John Duran is a criminal defense attorney and former West Hollywood mayor who served on the West Hollywood City Council from 2001 to 2020. He also serves part time as a judge pro tem in Los Angeles County courts.

MayorAlso known as John J. Duran

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by John Duran, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by John Duran

Portrait of John Duran

John Duran

Role at the time: Former West Hollywood mayor and candidate for West Hollywood City Council

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Former West Hollywood mayor John Duran said the council majority that approved Flock cameras with amendments took privacy concerns into account and kept data from being shared with ICE, and that the cameras would be carefully regulated.

“The majority that passed the Flock cameras with amendments took those privacy concerns into consideration and made sure that data was not going to be shared with ICE agents The cameras would be carefully regulated and used only to solve the crimes that we need to get solved.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Candidates vie for three seats on WeHo City CouncilCandidate profiles, each candidate's answer on Flock cameras
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Duran supports West Hollywood's current Flock contract and says the council's amendments already addressed privacy concerns, including keeping data from ICE. He defends continued use under the existing rules rather than making his support depend on new limits.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage